[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150123160335.GB32592@phnom.home.cmpxchg.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:03:35 -0500
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mm-commits@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, mhocko@...e.cz, cl@...ux.com
Subject: Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol:
remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 07:46:43AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> I added some debugging. First, the problem is only seen with SMP disabled.
> Second, there is only one online node.
>
> Without your patch:
>
> Node 0 online 1 high 1 memory 1 cpu 0 normal 1 tmp 0 rtpn c00000003d240600
> Node 1 online 0 high 0 memory 0 cpu 0 normal 0 tmp -1 rtpn c00000003d240640
> Node 2 online 0 high 0 memory 0 cpu 0 normal 0 tmp -1 rtpn c00000003d240680
>
> [ and so on up to node 255 ]
>
> With your patch:
>
> Node 0 online 1 high 1 memory 1 cpu 0 normal 1 rtpn c00000003d240600
> Unable to handle kernel paging request for data at address 0x0000af50
> Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000000895a3c
> Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
>
> The log message is after the call to kzalloc_node.
>
> So it doesn't look like the fallback is working, at least not with ppc64
> in non-SMP mode.
Yep, and Christoph confirmed that it's not meant to work like that.
The patch is flawed.
Thanks for testing and sorry for breaking your setup.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists