[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150123163231.GB11745@x1>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:32:31 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...inux.com, jason@...edaemon.net,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 RESEND 2/8] irqchip: Supply new driver for STi based
devices
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > This driver is used to enable System Configuration Register controlled
> > External, CTI (Core Sight), PMU (Performance Management), and PL310 L2
> > Cache IRQs prior to use.
>
> I'm wondering how this is related to irq_chip,
It doesn't really. At least, it doesn't make use of the framework.
It was the most relevant subsystem.
> but well, I don't mind it being parked here.
Thanks Thomas. I was hoping for that response.
> Though I really cannot say anything about this DT translation
> machinery for a single sysconfig register, other than it looks
> completely overengineered to me.
I understnad where you're coming from, but don't all drivers just
'twiddle some register bits'?
> The only technical comment I have is: shouldn't all the stuff except
> the resume function be marked __init or is any of this required post
> init?
It's not common to mark functions invoked at and affter *_probe() as
__init. At least, not as far as I'm aware.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists