[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150123012334.GA32632@js1304-P5Q-DELUXE>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 10:23:34 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei.yes@...il.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Hui Zhu <teawater@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mgorman@...e.de, hannes@...xchg.org,
riel@...hat.com, vbabka@...e.cz, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
wangnan0@...wei.com, davidlohr@...com, rientjes@...gle.com,
sasha.levin@...cle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Hui Zhu <zhuhui@...omi.com>,
Weixing Liu <liuweixing@...omi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CMA: treat free cma pages as non-free if not ALLOC_CMA
on watermark checking
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 10:12:43AM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> > > Just out of curiosity, "new zone"? Something like movable zone?
> >
> > Yes, I named it as ZONE_CMA. Maybe I can send prototype of
> > implementation within 1 or 2 weeks.
>
> Ugghh. I'd rather reduce the zone types. Do we need slab allocator etc
> allocations in that zone? This will multiply the management structures in
> various subsystems.
Hello,
Pages in CMA area should be movable so slab allocator which uses
unmovable/reclaimable allocation wouldn't need to consider that zone.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists