linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v4 1/2] x86/xen: add xen_is_preemptible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150123185711.GW17887@wotan.suse.de>
Date:	Fri, 23 Jan 2015 19:57:11 +0100
From:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
To:	David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
Cc:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>,
	konrad.wilk@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com,
	xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC v4 1/2] x86/xen: add
	xen_is_preemptible_hypercall()

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:30:16AM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 23/01/15 00:29, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...e.com>
> > 
> > On kernels with voluntary or no preemption we can run
> > into situations where a hypercall issued through userspace
> > will linger around as it addresses sub-operatiosn in kernel
> > context (multicalls). Such operations can trigger soft lockup
> > detection.
> > 
> > We want to address a way to let the kernel voluntarily preempt
> > such calls even on non preempt kernels, to address this we first
> > need to distinguish which hypercalls fall under this category.
> > This implements xen_is_preemptible_hypercall() which lets us do
> > just that by adding a secondary hypercall page, calls made via
> > the new page may be preempted.
> [...]
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypercall.h
> > @@ -84,6 +84,22 @@
> >  
> >  extern struct { char _entry[32]; } hypercall_page[];
> >  
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT
> > +extern struct { char _entry[32]; } preemptible_hypercall_page[];
> > +
> > +static inline bool xen_is_preemptible_hypercall(struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +{
> > +	return !user_mode_vm(regs) &&
> > +		regs->ip >= (unsigned long)preemptible_hypercall_page &&
> > +		regs->ip < (unsigned long)preemptible_hypercall_page + PAGE_SIZE;
> 
> I think you can optimize this to:
> 
>     return (regs->ip >> PAGE_SHIFT) == preemptible_hypercall_pfn

I take it you meant preemptible_hypercall_page ?

> 	&& !user_mode_vm(regs);

If so I don't see how this can work as an identical replacement.
Consider a PAGE_SIZE is 16, so PAGE_SHIFT would be 4, and lets
say we are checking for byte 2 which should be in the page:

; 0b0010 >>4
	0

Can you elaborate more on this, or can we perhaps leave such
optimization as an evolution to avoid regressions if you are
not 100% certain?

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/