[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54C2B80B.8050501@zytor.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 13:07:23 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: question about save_xstate_sig() - WHY DOES THIS WORK?
On 01/23/2015 11:34 AM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> While working on a patch series to defer FPU state loading until
> kernel -> user space transition, and be more lazy with FPU state
> while in the kernel, I came across this code in save_xstate_sig().
>
> Not only is this broken with my new code, but it looks like it may
> be broken with the current code, too...
>
> Specifically, save_user_xstate() may page fault and sleep. After
> returning from the page fault, there is no guarantee that the
> FPU state will be restored into the CPU, when the system is not
> running with eager fpu mode.
>
> In that case, what prevents us from saving random FPU register state
> to the user's stack frame? Potentially state containing data from
> other programs...
>
If the FPU state is not current, we'll have CR0.TS = 1 and the XSAVE
will cause an #NM exception, which will cause the FPU state to be
swapped in.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists