linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PCI: quirks: DMA alias quirk for Adaptec 3405

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150123224652.GP29776@google.com>
Date:	Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:46:52 -0600
From:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To:	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, aacraid@...ptec.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: quirks: DMA alias quirk for Adaptec 3405

On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:26:50AM -0700, Alex Williamson wrote:
> As noted in the added comment, this device is actually an Intel 80333
> I/O processor where the exposed device at 0e.0 is actually the address
> translation unit of the I/O processor and a hidden, private device at
> 01.0 masters the DMA for the device.  In order to enable the IOMMU, we
> therefore need to create a fixed alias between the exposed and hidden
> devfn.
> 
> Scenarios like this are potentially likely for any device incorporating
> this I/O processor, so this little bit of abstraction with the fixed
> alias table should make future additions trivial.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> Cc: Adaptec OEM Raid Solutions <aacraid@...ptec.com>

I added the symptoms (log messages) to the changelog and applied this to
pci/virtualization for v3.20, thanks!

> ---
> 
>  drivers/pci/quirks.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/quirks.c b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> index ed6f89b..19bdb17 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/quirks.c
> @@ -3528,6 +3528,43 @@ DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_JMICRON,
>  			 quirk_dma_func1_alias);
>  
>  /*
> + * Some devices DMA with the wrong devfn, not just the wrong function.
> + * quirk_fixed_dma_alias() uses this table to create fixed aliass, where
> + * the alias is "fixed" and independent of the device devfn.
> + *
> + * For example, the Adaptec 3405 is a PCIe card making use of an Intel 80333
> + * I/O processor.  To software, this appears as a straightforward PCIe-to-PCI/X
> + * bridge with a single device on the subordinate bus.  In reality, the exposed
> + * device at 0e.0 is the Address Translation Unit (ATU) of the controller that
> + * provides a bridge to the internal bus of the I/O processor.  The controller
> + * supports private devices, which can be hidden from PCI config space.  In the
> + * case of the Adaptec 3405, a private device at 01.0 appears to be the DMA
> + * engine, which therefore needs to become a DMA alias for the device.
> + */
> +static const struct pci_device_id fixed_dma_alias_tbl[] = {
> +	{ PCI_DEVICE_SUB(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ADAPTEC2, 0x0285,
> +			 PCI_VENDOR_ID_ADAPTEC2, 0x02bb), /* Adaptec 3405 */
> +	  .driver_data = PCI_DEVFN(1, 0) },
> +	{ 0 }
> +};
> +
> +static void quirk_fixed_dma_alias(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	const struct pci_device_id *id;
> +
> +	id = pci_match_id(fixed_dma_alias_tbl, dev);
> +	if (id) {
> +		dev->dma_alias_devfn = id->driver_data;
> +		dev->dev_flags |= PCI_DEV_FLAGS_DMA_ALIAS_DEVFN;
> +		dev_info(&dev->dev, "Enabling fixed DMA alias to %02x.%d\n",
> +			 PCI_SLOT(dev->dma_alias_devfn),
> +			 PCI_FUNC(dev->dma_alias_devfn));
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_HEADER(PCI_VENDOR_ID_ADAPTEC2, 0x0285, quirk_fixed_dma_alias);
> +
> +/*
>   * A few PCIe-to-PCI bridges fail to expose a PCIe capability, resulting in
>   * using the wrong DMA alias for the device.  Some of these devices can be
>   * used as either forward or reverse bridges, so we need to test whether the
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/