[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54C2D3B5.5080808@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 18:05:25 -0500
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"davej@...emonkey.org.uk >> Dave Jones" <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
Subject: Re: rcu, sched: WARNING: CPU: 30 PID: 23771 at kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:337
rcu_read_unlock_special+0x369/0x550()
On 01/23/2015 05:54 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 04:51:52PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> > On 01/23/2015 04:36 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> > > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
>>> > > index 8669de884445..ec99dc16aa38 100644
>>> > > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
>>> > > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
>>> > > @@ -322,6 +322,7 @@ void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
>>> > > special = t->rcu_read_unlock_special;
>>> > > if (special.b.need_qs) {
>>> > > rcu_preempt_qs();
>>> > > + t->rcu_read_unlock_special.need_qs = false;
>> >
>> > It didn't compile, I've used:
>> >
>> > t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.need_qs = false;
> Apologies, I should have marked it "untested". Good show on finding
> the correct fix.
>
> But does your fixed version help? ;-)
I haven't seen it happening it again, but you won't get a "yes" out of me
until tomorrow evening :)
Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists