[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150123231738.GB32318@piout.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 00:17:38 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Sylvain Rochet <sylvain.rochet@...secur.com>
Cc: Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com>, nicolas.ferre@...el.com,
linux@....linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peda@...ntia.se, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/12] pm: at91: rename file name: pm_slowclock.S
-->pm_suspend.S
Hi,
On 23/01/2015 at 20:17:19 +0100, Sylvain Rochet wrote :
> Hello Wenyou,
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:17:01PM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm_suspend.S b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm_suspend.S
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..420e730
> > --- /dev/null
>
>
> > + /* Turn off the main oscillator */
> > + ldr tmp1, [pmc, #AT91_CKGR_MOR]
> > + bic tmp1, tmp1, #AT91_PMC_MOSCEN
>
> at91sam9x5 and probably others need a key here:
> orr tmp1, tmp1, #AT91_PMC_KEY
>
> > + str tmp1, [pmc, #AT91_CKGR_MOR]
>
>
>
> > + /* Wait for interrupt */
> > + mcr p15, 0, tmp1, c7, c0, 4
>
> The linux-3.10-at91 branch uses a different approach which seem
> necessary for newer board, you probably forget to merge the following:
>
> /*
> * Put the processor to enter into Standby mode, wait for interrupt to wakeup
> */
> .macro _do_wfi
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_CPU_V7)
> dsb
>
> /* Disable the processor clock */
> mov tmp1, #AT91_PMC_PCK
> str tmp1, [pmc, #AT91_PMC_SCDR]
>
> wfi @ Wait For Interrupt
> #else
> mcr p15, 0, tmp1, c7, c0, 4
> #endif
>
> .endm
>
> .text
>
> ENTRY(at91_slow_clock)
> (...)
> /* Wait for interrupt */
> _do_wfi
> (...)
>
>
>
>
> > + /* Turn on the main oscillator */
> > + ldr tmp1, [pmc, #AT91_CKGR_MOR]
> > + orr tmp1, tmp1, #AT91_PMC_MOSCEN
>
> at91sam9x5 and probably others need a key here:
> orr tmp1, tmp1, #AT91_PMC_KEY
>
> > + str tmp1, [pmc, #AT91_CKGR_MOR]
>
>
>
> What about the following parts which are also in linux-3.10-at91 branch
> but not in this rework, are they necessary ?
>
> sdr_sr_done:
> /* Disable MPDDRC Clock*/
> cmp ddrcid, #0
> beq 2f
> bic tmp2, ddrcid, #0xe0 /* fetch lowest 5 bits */
> mov tmp1, #0x01
> mov tmp1, tmp1, lsl tmp2
>
> tst ddrcid, #0x20 /* > 32 ? */
> beq 1f
> str tmp1, [pmc, #AT91_PMC_PCDR1]
> b 2f
> 1:
> str tmp1, [pmc, #AT91_PMC_PCDR]
> 2:
>
> /* Disable DDR Clock */
> mov tmp1, #AT91_PMC_SYS_DDR
> str tmp1, [pmc, #AT91_PMC_SCDR]
>
>
>
>
> /* Enable MPDDRC Clock*/
> cmp ddrcid, #0
> beq 4f
> bic tmp2, ddrcid, #0xe0 /* fetch lowest 5 bits */
> mov tmp1, #0x01
> mov tmp1, tmp1, lsl tmp2
>
> tst ddrcid, #0x20 /* > 32 ? */
> beq 3f
> str tmp1, [pmc, #AT91_PMC_PCER1]
> b 4f
> 3:
> str tmp1, [pmc, #AT91_PMC_PCER]
> 4:
>
> /* Enable DDR clock */
> mov tmp1, #AT91_PMC_SYS_DDR
> str tmp1, [pmc, #AT91_PMC_SCER]
>
>
This is a rework, what is part of linux-3.10-at91 and not yet present in
mainline should be part of a following series. I would prefer not mixing
reworks and "new" functionalities (they have been present in the atmel
tree for a while but never mainlined). I would say that PM on 9x5, n12
and sama5 in mainline is clearly not well tested and is lagging behind
the atmel tree.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists