linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb: host: oxu210hp-hcd: Fix deadlock in oxu_qh

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 24 Jan 2015 10:52:27 -0500 (EST)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@...ux.it>,
	<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<ldv-project@...uxtesting.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: host: oxu210hp-hcd: Fix deadlock in oxu_qh_alloc()

On Sat, 24 Jan 2015, Alexey Khoroshilov wrote:

> oxu_qh_alloc() acquires oxu->mem_lock spinlock, finds free qh slot
> and calls ehci_qtd_alloc() to initialize qh->dummy, but
> ehci_qtd_alloc() acquires oxu->mem_lock as well.
> That means an unavoidable deadlock in oxu_qh_alloc().
> 
> The patch fixes the issue by introduction of unlocked version
> of ehci_qtd_alloc().

This deadlock would affect anybody the moment they plugged a USB device
into one of these controllers, right?

Which means nobody can possibly be using them under Linux.  So wouldn't
it be better to remove the driver entirely?

Alan Stern
 
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/host/oxu210hp-hcd.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/oxu210hp-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/oxu210hp-hcd.c
> index 036924e640f5..15d4cf2c35cd 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/oxu210hp-hcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/oxu210hp-hcd.c
> @@ -573,13 +573,11 @@ static inline void oxu_qtd_free(struct oxu_hcd *oxu, struct ehci_qtd *qtd)
>  	spin_unlock(&oxu->mem_lock);
>  }
>  
> -static struct ehci_qtd *ehci_qtd_alloc(struct oxu_hcd *oxu)
> +static struct ehci_qtd *ehci_qtd_alloc_unlocked(struct oxu_hcd *oxu)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  	struct ehci_qtd *qtd = NULL;
>  
> -	spin_lock(&oxu->mem_lock);
> -
>  	for (i = 0; i < QTD_NUM; i++)
>  		if (!oxu->qtd_used[i])
>  			break;
> @@ -598,6 +596,17 @@ static struct ehci_qtd *ehci_qtd_alloc(struct oxu_hcd *oxu)
>  		oxu->qtd_used[i] = 1;
>  	}
>  
> +	return qtd;
> +}
> +
> +static struct ehci_qtd *ehci_qtd_alloc(struct oxu_hcd *oxu)
> +{
> +	struct ehci_qtd *qtd;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&oxu->mem_lock);
> +
> +	qtd = ehci_qtd_alloc_unlocked(oxu);
> +
>  	spin_unlock(&oxu->mem_lock);
>  
>  	return qtd;
> @@ -651,7 +660,7 @@ static struct ehci_qh *oxu_qh_alloc(struct oxu_hcd *oxu)
>  		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&qh->qtd_list);
>  
>  		/* dummy td enables safe urb queuing */
> -		qh->dummy = ehci_qtd_alloc(oxu);
> +		qh->dummy = ehci_qtd_alloc_unlocked(oxu);
>  		if (qh->dummy == NULL) {
>  			oxu_dbg(oxu, "no dummy td\n");
>  			oxu->qh_used[i] = 0;
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/