linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86: Add Isolated Memory Regions for Quark X1000

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54C41598.5080801@nexus-software.ie>
Date:	Sat, 24 Jan 2015 21:58:48 +0000
From:	Bryan O'Donoghue <pure.logic@...us-software.ie>
To:	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
	"Ong, Boon Leong" <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>
CC:	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"dvhart@...radead.org" <dvhart@...radead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] x86: Add Isolated Memory Regions for Quark X1000

On 24/01/15 21:56, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
>>>> +
>>>> +                      if ((imr_to_phys(imr.addr_lo) == base) &&
>>>> +                          (imr_to_phys(imr.addr_hi) == max)) {
>>> I think we need to take care of the size that has been fix-up here ...
>>>
>>>> +                              found = 1;
>>>> +                              reg = i;
>>
>> According to your comment this line becomes redundant.
>>
>
> Ah but I still think though.

"Ah but I still think *I'll keep* that though

:)

> We eventually do an imr_write(reg, &imr); which I think reads better
> than imr_write(i, &imr);
>
> --
> BOD

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/