[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150125173433.GA10390@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 18:34:33 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] perf: Make perf aware of tracefs
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 01:13:35PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
SNIP
> @@ -351,11 +385,15 @@ const char *find_tracing_dir(void)
> if (tracing_found)
> return tracing;
>
> - debugfs = find_debugfs();
> - if (!debugfs)
> - return NULL;
> + debugfs = find_tracefs();
> + if (!debugfs) {
> + tracing_dir = "/tracing";
> + debugfs = find_debugfs();
> + if (!debugfs)
> + return NULL;
so this pattern 'try tracefs, if that does not work try debugfs'
is all over the patch.. how about we add new new 'virtual' fs to
encapsulate that, like:
with followign interface:
bool tpfs_configured(void);
const char *tpfs_find_mountpoint(void);
int tpfs_valid_mountpoint(const char *debugfs);
char *tpfs_mount(const char *mountpoint);
extern char tpfs_mountpoint[];
It does not neceserily needs to reside in tools/lib/api/fs/tpfs.[ch],
but I believe we need some form of encapsulation for this.
jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists