linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.18 090/183] clk: rockchip: fix rk3288 cpuclk core dividers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:06:52 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>,
	Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.18 090/183] clk: rockchip: fix rk3288 cpuclk core dividers

3.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>

commit 9880d4277f6aab6b21404c824f9d9c652ba518ac upstream.

Commit 0e5bdb3f9fa5 (clk: rockchip: switch to using the new cpuclk type
for armclk) didn't take into account that the divider used on rk3288
are of the (n+1) type.

The rk3066 and rk3188 socs use more complex divider types making it
necessary for the list-elements to be the real register-values to write.

Therefore reduce divider values in the table accordingly so that they
really are the values that should be written to the registers and match
the dividers actually specified for the rk3288.

Reported-by: Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>
Fixes: 0e5bdb3f9fa5 ("clk: rockchip: switch to using the new cpuclk type for armclk")
Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c |   28 ++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
@@ -142,20 +142,20 @@ struct rockchip_pll_rate_table rk3288_pl
 	}
 
 static struct rockchip_cpuclk_rate_table rk3288_cpuclk_rates[] __initdata = {
-	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1800000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
-	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1704000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
-	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1608000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
-	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1512000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
-	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1416000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
-	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1200000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
-	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1008000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
-	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 816000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
-	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 696000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
-	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 600000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
-	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 408000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
-	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 312000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
-	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 216000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
-	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 126000000, 2, 4, 2, 4, 4),
+	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1800000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1704000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1608000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1512000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1416000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1200000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE(1008000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 816000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 696000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 600000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 408000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 312000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 216000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
+	RK3288_CPUCLK_RATE( 126000000, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3),
 };
 
 static const struct rockchip_cpuclk_reg_data rk3288_cpuclk_data = {


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/