linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.14 95/98] net: fix creation adjacent device symlinks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150125180717.009640454@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Sun, 25 Jan 2015 10:07:53 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Alexander Fomichev <git.user@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@...all.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3.14 95/98] net: fix creation adjacent device symlinks

3.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: "Alexander Y. Fomichev" <git.user@...il.com>

commit 7ce64c79c4decdeb1afe0bf2f6ef834b382871d1 upstream.

__netdev_adjacent_dev_insert may add adjust device of different net
namespace, without proper check it leads to emergence of broken
sysfs links from/to devices in another namespace.
Fix: rewrite netdev_adjacent_is_neigh_list macro as a function,
     move net_eq check into netdev_adjacent_is_neigh_list.
     (thanks David)
     related to: 4c75431ac3520631f1d9e74aa88407e6374dbbc4

Signed-off-by: Alexander Fomichev <git.user@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Miquel van Smoorenburg <mikevs@...all.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 net/core/dev.c |   18 +++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -4705,9 +4705,14 @@ static void netdev_adjacent_sysfs_del(st
 	sysfs_remove_link(&(dev->dev.kobj), linkname);
 }
 
-#define netdev_adjacent_is_neigh_list(dev, dev_list) \
-		(dev_list == &dev->adj_list.upper || \
-		 dev_list == &dev->adj_list.lower)
+static inline bool netdev_adjacent_is_neigh_list(struct net_device *dev,
+						 struct net_device *adj_dev,
+						 struct list_head *dev_list)
+{
+	return (dev_list == &dev->adj_list.upper ||
+		dev_list == &dev->adj_list.lower) &&
+		net_eq(dev_net(dev), dev_net(adj_dev));
+}
 
 static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(struct net_device *dev,
 					struct net_device *adj_dev,
@@ -4737,7 +4742,7 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(
 	pr_debug("dev_hold for %s, because of link added from %s to %s\n",
 		 adj_dev->name, dev->name, adj_dev->name);
 
-	if (netdev_adjacent_is_neigh_list(dev, dev_list)) {
+	if (netdev_adjacent_is_neigh_list(dev, adj_dev, dev_list)) {
 		ret = netdev_adjacent_sysfs_add(dev, adj_dev, dev_list);
 		if (ret)
 			goto free_adj;
@@ -4758,7 +4763,7 @@ static int __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert(
 	return 0;
 
 remove_symlinks:
-	if (netdev_adjacent_is_neigh_list(dev, dev_list))
+	if (netdev_adjacent_is_neigh_list(dev, adj_dev, dev_list))
 		netdev_adjacent_sysfs_del(dev, adj_dev->name, dev_list);
 free_adj:
 	kfree(adj);
@@ -4791,8 +4796,7 @@ static void __netdev_adjacent_dev_remove
 	if (adj->master)
 		sysfs_remove_link(&(dev->dev.kobj), "master");
 
-	if (netdev_adjacent_is_neigh_list(dev, dev_list) &&
-	    net_eq(dev_net(dev),dev_net(adj_dev)))
+	if (netdev_adjacent_is_neigh_list(dev, adj_dev, dev_list))
 		netdev_adjacent_sysfs_del(dev, adj_dev->name, dev_list);
 
 	list_del_rcu(&adj->list);


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/