linux-kernel - Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <109548.1422221788@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Sun, 25 Jan 2015 16:36:28 -0500
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	mm-commits@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, mhocko@...e.cz
Subject: Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failure due to 'mm: memcontrol: remove unnecessary soft limit tree node test'

On Sat, 24 Jan 2015 02:16:23 -0500, Johannes Weiner said:

> I would generally agree, but this code, which implements a userspace
> interface, is already grotesquely inefficient and heavyhanded.  It's
> also superseded in the next release, so we can just keep this simple
> at this point.

Wait, what?  Userspace interface that's superceded in the next release?

I *hope* this was intended as "Yes,it's ugly in v4 of the patch, v5 is
a lot cleaner..."

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped