[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54C57496.30406@ventoso.org>
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 23:56:22 +0100
From: Luca Olivetti <luca@...toso.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Fengguag Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Frank Schäfer <fschaefer.oss@...glemail.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.18 105/183] [media] af9005: fix kernel panic on init
if compiled without IR
El 25/01/15 a les 23:01, Greg Kroah-Hartman ha escrit:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2015 at 08:32:59PM +0100, Luca Olivetti wrote:
>> El 25/01/15 a les 19:07, Greg Kroah-Hartman ha escrit:
>>> 3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>>
>> I don't have any objection apart from the description: IIRC the bug is
>> triggered only if the kernel is compiled without module support.
>> In any case I think that symbol_request should return NULL if the
>> requested symbol is not available, either because the kernel has been
>> compiled without module support or the required symbol is not provided
>> by any module (though I think in the latter case it already works this
>> way, at least it did at the time I wrote the driver).
>> Or, as I said here
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/2/4/350
>> maybe symbol_request isn't the correct approach to provide multiple,
>> alternative, implementations.
>
> The description is identical to what is in Linus's tree, so there's not
> much I can do about it at this late point in time, sorry.
I'm OK with that, but will somebody look at/clarify the behavior of
symbol_request when modules are disabled?
Bye
--
Luca
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists