[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54C5F965.90100@monstr.eu>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:23:01 +0100
From: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
To: Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
CC: devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@...inx.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Ola Jeppson <ola@...pteva.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: zynq: DT: Add USB to device tree
On 01/26/2015 09:19 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Hi Michal,
>
> Am 03.12.2014 um 09:39 schrieb Michal Simek:
>> On 12/02/2014 05:07 PM, Soren Brinkmann wrote:
>>> Add USB nodes to zc702, zc706 and zed device trees.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@...inx.com>
>>> ---
>>> v3:
>>> - rename phy nodes: usb_phy -> phy0
>>> - rebased onto zynq/dt
>>> v2:
>>> - remove '@0' from phy node name
>>> - don't add bogus space
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-7000.dtsi | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc702.dts | 11 +++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zc706.dts | 10 ++++++++++
>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-zed.dts | 10 ++++++++++
>>> 4 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
> [...]
>>
>> Applied to zynq/dt.
>
> Hm, I don't see this patch in linux-next next-20150123...
>
> And if I apply it to my -next based tree, adding corresponding nodes to
> zynq-parallella.dts, I get repeatedly:
>
> [ +0,012242] ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.0: no of_node; not parsing pinctrl DT
> [ +0,000157] ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.0: ChipIdea HDRC found, lpm: 0; cap:
> f090e100 op: f090e140
> [ +0,000081] platform ci_hdrc.0: Driver ci_hdrc requests probe deferral
> [ +0,005360] ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.1: no of_node; not parsing pinctrl DT
> [ +0,000120] ci_hdrc ci_hdrc.1: ChipIdea HDRC found, lpm: 0; cap:
> f0910100 op: f0910140
> [ +0,001810] platform ci_hdrc.1: Driver ci_hdrc requests probe deferral
>
> Am I missing any other patches or config options?
> (I do notice that the pinctrl v3 patch that got merged has a trivial bug
> for usb0, for which I'll send a patch later on.)
Why is it deferred? Is it because of pinmuxing stuff?
Thanks,
Michal
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists