lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150126095757.GB23384@e102568-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:	Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:57:57 +0000
From:	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/2] arm: kernel: fix pci_mmap_page_range() offset
 calculation

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:59:11PM +0000, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:19:16AM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > The pci_mmap_page_range() API should be written to expect offset
> > values representing PCI memory resource addresses as seen by user
> > space, through the pci_resource_to_user() API.
> > 
> > ARM relies on the standard implementation of pci_resource_to_user()
> > which actually is an identity map and exports to user space
> > PCI memory resources as they are stored in PCI devices resources
> > structures, which represent CPU physical addresses (fixed-up using
> > BUS to CPU address conversions) not PCI bus addresses.
> > 
> > Therefore, on ARM platforms where the mapping between CPU and BUS
> > address is not a 1:1 the current pci_mmap_page_range() implementation is
> > erroneous, in that an additional shift is applied to an already fixed-up
> > offset passed from userspace.
> > 
> > Hence, this patch removes the mem_offset from the pgoff calculation
> > since the offset as passed from user space already represents the CPU
> > physical address corresponding to the resource to be mapped, ie no
> > additional offset should be applied.
> > 
> > Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
> 
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>

Thank you, I will ask Russell to merge it.

Lorenzo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ