linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] pm: at91: Workaround DDRSDRC self-refresh bug with LPDDR1 memories.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150126134453.GA27559@gradator.net>
Date:	Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:44:53 +0100
From:	Sylvain Rochet <sylvain.rochet@...secur.com>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@...el.com>, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com, peda@...ntia.se
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/12] pm: at91: Workaround DDRSDRC self-refresh bug
 with LPDDR1 memories.

Hello Nicolas,

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 02:34:38PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Le 26/01/2015 11:36, Sylvain Rochet a écrit :
> > 
> > I think we should explain we are dealing with an errata here, this is 
> > not obvious at first sight, the patch summary may find its place here :-)
> 
> True but the problem is that this errata is not public yet, it will be
> in a couple of weeks.
> 
> I have the feeling though that the commit message is pretty clear. We'll
> maybe add that it"s an actual errata.

Humm, this is not what I meant actually. I only proposed a code source 
comment explaining why this is done this way, the current patch summary 
looked like it will be perfect between /* */ ;-)

Sylvain
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/