[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13294516.zBBDkdi9pn@tachyon.chronox.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 05:35:07 +0100
From: Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
'Quentin Gouchet' <quentin.gouchet@...il.com>,
'LKML' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/2] crypto: AF_ALG: add AEAD support
Am Montag, 26. Januar 2015, 11:06:31 schrieb Herbert Xu:
Hi Herbert,
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 02:19:17AM +0100, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > + /*
> > + * Require exactly one IOV block as the AEAD operation is a one shot
> > + * due to the authentication tag.
> > + */
> > + if (msg->msg_iter.nr_segs != 1)
> > + return -ENOMSG;
>
> Why does limit exist? The fact that you have to do it in one go does
> not limit the number of receive IOVs, at least not to one.
It seems I have misunderstood you in the last discussion.
in the last discussion [1] I tried to explain why I did not consider multiple
IOVs. In the reply to my answer [2] I seem to have understood that the current
implementation is fine.
So, shall I now implement the multiple IOVs approach outlined in [1]? If yes,
how many IOVs shall I consider?
>
> Cheers,
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-crypto/msg12861.html
[2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-crypto/msg12935.html
--
Ciao
Stephan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists