[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150126164229.GB21293@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 16:42:29 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc: Bo Shen <voice.shen@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, Alexander Morozov <linux@...tdown.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ASoC: codecs: wm8904: add dt ids table
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 04:24:38PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Le 16/01/2015 02:17, Bo Shen a écrit :
> >> Does this end up in the i2c_driver_id driver data or do we need some
> >> extra code when devtype is assigned to check for an of_node and look at
> >> the DT data instead? That certainly used to be the case...
> > At the beginning I think as the same as you, and also add the code to
> > get the data as I do in <drivers/misc/atmel-ssc.c>. However, as I
> > remember, I2C seems only use the compatible string after the comma, that
> > means only for "wlf,wm8904", it uses "wm8904" to match. So, I remove all
> > the code I added, and just keep these, and it can get the device type
> > correctly.
> > So, when I submit the patch and keep the code as simple as possible.
> I don't understand what's keeping this patch from being applied. Voice,
> do you mind re-sending?
I need to convince myself that the above actually works and is doing the
right thing; the above explanation sounds like if it works it might be
relying on a bug.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists