[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150126170048.GA2080@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:00:48 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Zach Brown <zab@...bo.net>,
Maxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@...allels.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>,
Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:AIO" <linux-aio@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] aio: add aio_kernel_() interface
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 12:18:23AM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > Also it might make sense to just offer aio_kernel_read/write intefaces
> > instead of the common submit wrapper, as that's much closer to other
> > kernel APIs, e.g.
> >
> > int aio_kernel_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct file *file,
> > struct iov_iter *iter, loff_t off,
> > void (*complete)(struct kiocb *iocb, long res));
> > int aio_kernel_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct file *file,
> > struct iov_iter *iter, loff_t off,
> > void (*complete)(struct kiocb *iocb, long res));
>
> It is like style of sync APIs, looks submit/complete is common
> for async APIs, like io_submit().
io_submit is a fairly horrible API. While Posix AIO isn't too much
better it does have separate APIs for read/write. Given that there
isn't much code shared I'd keep an API that feels familar.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists