linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: core: use card pointer as the first parameter of execute

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150126174845.GJ26493@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:48:45 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"tgih.jun@...sung.com" <tgih.jun@...sung.com>,
	Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>, Jianqun Xu <xjq@...k-chips.com>,
	chenfen <chenfen@...k-chips.com>,
	Chris Zhong <zyw@...k-chips.com>,
	lintao <lintao@...k-chips.com>,
	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
	"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Han Jiang <hj@...k-chips.com>,
	Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...era.com>,
	Tao Huang <huangtao@...k-chips.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Addy Ke <addy.ke@...k-chips.com>,
	Alexandru Stan <amstan@...omium.org>,
	Paweł Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	姚智情 <yzq@...k-chips.com>,
	zhangqing <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>,
	Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>,
	Eddie Cai <cf@...k-chips.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Sonny Rao <sonnyrao@...omium.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Lin Huang <hl@...k-chips.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	"zhenfu.fang" <zhenfu.fang@...k-chips.com>,
	zyf <zyf@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mmc: core: use card pointer as the first parameter
 of execute_tuning()

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 09:45:07AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Ulf,
> 
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On 26 January 2015 at 12:19, Addy Ke <addy.ke@...k-chips.com> wrote:
> >> We need to take the card pointer in execute_tuning() for mmc_send_status(),
> >
> > mmc_send_status() is an mmc core function, not intended for host's to call.
> >
> >> but mmc->card is NULL in tuning state. So we need change the first parameter
> >> of execute_tuning() to card pointer(struct mmc_card * card).
> >
> > So, why do we need this?
> 
> I asked Addy to post upstream against mmc_send_tuning(), but I guess
> he didn't (he posted against Alex's NAKed patch instead).
> 
> ...when I talked to him about it, Addy was asserting that when tuning
> fails it is important (at least on dw_mmc on rk3288) that we wait for
> the card to stop being busy and that the way to detect was using
> mmc_send_status().
> 
> That would mean that against upstream you'd need to change
> mmc_send_tuning() to take in the card as well (or move the "host->card
> = card" assignment to before UHS init, which seems less desirable?)
> 
> What do you think about that?  Is there a better solution?

That sounds like a generic thing though - in which case, what do the
specs have to say on this, and does the code implement what it says?

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/