linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] uio: Simplify the lifetime logic of struct uio

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150126200403.GA32312@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 26 Jan 2015 12:04:03 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Mandeep Sandhu <mandeep.sandhu@...ninc.com>
Cc:	hjk@...sjkoch.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] uio: Simplify the lifetime logic of struct
 uio_device.

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:57:30AM -0800, Mandeep Sandhu wrote:
> >> +
> >> +     ret = kobject_set_name(&idev->device.kobj, "uio%d", idev->minor);
> >
> > dev_set_name()?
> 
> There's another instance of use of kobject_set_name in
> uio_major_init(). Should I change that too ,or that should be done in
> a new (unrelated) patch?

Unrelated please, one logical change per patch is the rules.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/