[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPc5daVu=hjjYwDoCwco=cdg16kib80ZBbArh3z8R+j2vq6C6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:35:36 -0800
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@...ox.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
twaugh@...hat.com, Git Mailing List <git@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: patch-2.7.3 no longer applies relative symbolic link patches
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:30 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org> wrote:
>>
>> Or did I miss a way that git-apply can take a git patch and apply it
>> to a tree that isn't a git repo?
>
> Exactly. "git apply" works as a straight "patch" replacement outside
> of a git repository. It doesn't actually need a git tree to work.
What is your take on CVE-2015-1196, which brought this /regression/ to
GNU patch?
If "git apply" get /fixed/ for that same CVE, would that /break/ your fix?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists