[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+5PVA7Hb1ppHFYA4wHC+uEyULk4m_7eX2FRNuisi1uOTagBEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 17:15:50 -0500
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@...ox.com>,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
twaugh@...hat.com, Git Mailing List <git@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: patch-2.7.3 no longer applies relative symbolic link patches
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org> wrote:
>>
>> Or did I miss a way that git-apply can take a git patch and apply it
>> to a tree that isn't a git repo?
>
> Exactly. "git apply" works as a straight "patch" replacement outside
> of a git repository. It doesn't actually need a git tree to work.
Ah. I had somehow missed that entirely. Good to know for future reference.
> (Of course, "git apply" is _not_ a "patch" replacement in the general
> sense. It only applies context diffs - preferentially git style ones -
> so no old-style patches etc need apply. And it's not
> replacement-compatible in a syntax sense either, in that while many of
> the options are the same, not all are etc etc).
Sure. Though for the Fedora kernel builds, we tend to use git
formatted patches only anyway. I might play around with this and see
how it works as the normal way to apply things.
josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists