[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150126.143402.1309886104452878553.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:34:02 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: isubramanian@....com
Cc: eric.dumazet@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
mlangsdo@...hat.com, patches@....com, kchudgar@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: net: xgene: fix: Out of order descriptor
bytes read
From: Iyappan Subramanian <isubramanian@....com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 13:12:23 -0800
>>> @@ -369,6 +369,8 @@ static int xgene_enet_process_ring(struct xgene_enet_desc_ring *ring,
>>> if (unlikely(xgene_enet_is_desc_slot_empty(raw_desc)))
>>> break;
>>>
>>> + /* read fpqnum field after dataaddr field */
>>> + smp_rmb();
>>> if (is_rx_desc(raw_desc))
>>> ret = xgene_enet_rx_frame(ring, raw_desc);
>>> else
>>
>> Reading your changelog, it looks like you need a plain rmb() here.
>
> rmb() translates into dsb, which in arm64 serializes everything
> including instructions and thus expensive compared to dmb.
>
> Do you see any issue with smp_rmb() (which translates into dmb) ?
smp_rmb() is not appropriate. You're not serializing accesses between
two cpus, you're serializing the cpu with the device.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists