[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54C6CDDC.5010507@nod.at>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:29:32 +0100
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Scot Doyle <lkml14@...tdoyle.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
CC: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] fbcon: user-defined cursor blink interval
Am 27.01.2015 um 00:09 schrieb Scot Doyle:
> Since users prefer different fbcon cursor blink intervals, allow the
> interval to be set via sysfs. The current interval of 200 milliseconds
> is retained as the default. Tested with intelfb.
>
> v2: Use kstrtos16() instead of kstrtoul() and min_t() as suggested by
> Geert Uytterhoeven
> v3: Add error messages as suggested by Tomi Valkeinen
> v4: Add rationale into patch descriptions as suggested by
> Richard Weinberger
Hehe, no need to resend immediately a v4, I'm just curios about the use case. :)
Why do users want a different blink interval? What is the use case?
And what are these users? Most people use a fbcon only for a few moments
to fix/restart X11.
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists