[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150126213419.531774eb@grimm.local.home>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 21:34:19 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16 v3] tracing: Add new file system tracefs
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 18:37:39 -0500
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> > the first call of tracing_init_dentry(). Prior to that it's NULL.
> > BTW, may I politely inquire what the fuck are those contortions in
> > tracing_init_dentry_tr() about? Looks like a stunningly convoluted
> > way to trigger that automount point creation early in
> > tracer_init_tracefs(). Why not do that right there explicitly?
>
> Yeah, that could be cleaned up. Before the tracefs code, it made much
> more sense to keep that as a single function. Now that
> global_array.dir is treated differently as the subdirs, it does make
> sense to have global_arry.dir initialized in a separate function.
>
> I'll update my patch series to do this.
Now I remember why I did this (as I changed the code and everything
blew up). The files in the tracing directory can be created by several
users (do a grep for fs_initcall() in kernel/trace/*.c). The first
caller to add a file initializes the tracing directory.
I guess I can have all the other callers use fs_initcall_sync(). I'm
assuming those come after fs_initcall().
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists