linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/16 v3] tracing: Add new file system tracefs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 27 Jan 2015 04:38:39 +0000
From:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/16 v3] tracing: Add new file system tracefs

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 08:03:50PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 20:02:18 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> > Now you see why I found just dropping the parent mutex easier.
> 
> And this is probably why kernfs does things the way it does. I can
> imagine it having the same locking issues.

The least said about kernfs locking, the better...

As for the use of trace_types_lock to serialize rmdir vs. event
addition/removal, I wonder what's wrong with actually using the
->i_mutex of /instances - you have a reference to its dentry,
after all...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/