lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAN1oZWzOfUrYSBEx=M0p0Dz4HHcaz-FtYOF5ON12oeG_WHPa-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:53:59 +0800
From:	Viet Nga Dao <vndao@...era.com>
To:	Viet Nga Dao <vndao@...era.com>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
Cc:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, nga_chi86 <ngachi86@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mtd] mtd:devices: Add Altera EPCQ Driver

On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:05 AM, Viet Nga Dao <vndao@...era.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 5:27 PM, Viet Nga Dao <vndao@...era.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Brian Norris
>> <computersforpeace@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:23:16AM -0800, vndao@...era.com wrote:
>>>> From: Viet Nga Dao <vndao@...era.com>
>>>>
>>>> Altera EPCQ Controller is a soft IP which enables access to Altera EPCQ and
>>>> EPCS flash chips. This patch adds driver for these devices.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Viet Nga Dao <vndao@...era.com>
>>>
>>> This drivers seems awfully similar to (and so I infer it is likely
>>> copy-and-pasted from) m25p80.c / spi-nor.c. Do you think it can be
>>> rewritten as a SPI NOR driver, under drivers/mtd/spi-nor/ ? It looks
>>> like these flash share most (all?) the same basic opcodes.
>>>
>> For Altera EPCQ flashes, almost operations are performed underline
>> hardware.
>
>Right, that's understandable. But that's what spi-nor.c was designed
>for: implementing hardware-specific functionality that is targeted
>directly at SPI flash. Did you take a look at the callbacks available in
>'struct spi_nor'?
>
>>Software only able to perform the following through
>> registers:
>>  -  read status register
>>  -  read id
>>  -  write status registers bit SR_BP0,SR_BP1, SR_BP2,SR_BP3, SR_TB
>> (http://www.altera.com.my/literature/hb/cfg/cfg_cf52012.pdf)
>
>OK
>
>> For read/write data: all the operations like QUAD_READ/WRITE,
>> FAST_READ/WRITE are handled by hardware as well. From software point
>> of view, there is no difference between these 2 modes.
>
>OK, so you don't have to hook up the dual/quad mode infrastructure. And
>you'd just implement dead-simple spi_nor.{read,write,erase}() callbacks.
>
>> That is why if rewrite the drivers to follow spi-nor structure, it
>> will require extra decoding works for the only few used opcodes.
>>
>I think you'd only have some very trivial work here.
>
>There would be some small work to reintroduce a properly-replaceable ID
>table, and callbacks like ->lock() and ->unlock(), but those should be
>implemented in spi-nor.c sooner or later anyway.
>

I am trying to modify the code to follow your recommendation. However,
for lock and unlock functions, i have to implement it in spi_nor.c ,
am i right? If yes, currently we already have existing spi_nor_lock
and spi_nor_unlock functions but they could not apply for my driver.
Should i create a new functions named altera_epcq_lock and unlock and
then map it to callback functions or i should the put  those code
sunder existing spi_nor_lock/unlock?

>Anyway, if you take another look at spi-nor.{c,h} and determine that
>it's too difficult, then I suppose I don't mind accepting your driver
>under its current design. Your hardware is pretty esoteric anyway, the
>driver is still pretty simple, and it'll never be supporting any common
>SPI NOR vendors (right?), so it's not too big of a maintenance problem,
>I expect. But I do want to make sure that we don't copy/paste to repeat
>the mistakes of old drivers. As I noted already, your driver inherited
>some of the quirks of the old m25p80.c code.
>
>So please, give drivers/mtd/spi-nor/ another look, and then we can
>resume this discussion.
>>>> ---
>>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/altera_epcq.txt        |   45 ++
>>>>  drivers/mtd/devices/Kconfig                        |   12 +
>>>>  drivers/mtd/devices/Makefile                       |    2 +-
>>>>  drivers/mtd/devices/altera_epcq.c                  |  804 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>  drivers/mtd/devices/altera_epcq.h                  |  130 ++++
>>>>  5 files changed, 992 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/altera_epcq.txt
>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/mtd/devices/altera_epcq.c
>>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/mtd/devices/altera_epcq.h
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/altera_epcq.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/altera_epcq.txt
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..d14f50e
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/altera_epcq.txt
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
>>>> +* MTD Altera EPCQ driver
>>>> +
>>>> +Required properties:
>>>> +- compatible: Should be "altr,epcq-1.0"
>>>> +- reg: Address and length of the register set  for the device. It contains
>>>> +  the information of registers in the same order as described by reg-names
>>>> +- reg-names: Should contain the reg names
>>>> +  "csr_base": Should contain the register configuration base address
>>>> +  "data_base": Should contain the data base address
>>>> +- is-epcs: boolean type.
>>>> +             If present, the device contains EPCS flashes.
>>>> +             Otherwise, it contains EPCQ flashes.
>>>> +- #address-cells: Must be <1>.
>>>> +- #size-cells: Must be <0>.
>>>> +- flash device tree subnode, there must be a node with the following fields:
>>>
>>> These subnodes definitely require a 'compatible' string. Perhaps they
>>> should be used to differentiate EPCS vs. EPCQ. Does "is-epcs" really
>>> need to be in the top-level controller node?
>>>
>>>> +     - reg: Should contain the flash id
>>>
>>> Should, or must? (This question is relevant, because you seem to make it
>>> optional in your code.) And what does the "flash ID" mean? It seems like
>>> you're using as a chip-select or bank index.
>>>
Yes, this is used for chip select. It is required, not optional. This
to ID for each flash in the device
>>>> +     - #address-cells: please refer to /mtd/partition.txt
>>>> +     - #size-cells: please refer to /mtd/partition.txt
>>>> +     For partitions inside each flash, please refer to /mtd/partition.txt
>>>> +
>>>> +Example:
>>>> +
>>>> +                     epcq_controller_0: epcq@...00000000 {
>>>> +                             compatible = "altr,epcq-1.0";
>>>> +                             reg = <0x00000001 0x00000000 0x00000020>,
>>>> +                                     <0x00000000 0x00000000 0x02000000>;
>>>> +                             reg-names = "csr_base", "data_base";
>>>> +                             #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> +                             #size-cells = <0>;
>>>> +                             flash0: epcq256@0 {
>>>> +                                     reg = <0>;
>>>> +                                     #address-cells = <1>;
>>>> +                                     #size-cells = <1>;
>>>> +                                     partition@0 {
>>>> +                                             /* 16 MB for raw data. */
>>>> +                                             label = "EPCQ Flash 0 raw data";
>>>> +                                             reg = <0x0 0x1000000>;
>>>> +                                     };
>>>> +                                     partition@...0000 {
>>>> +                                             /* 16 MB for jffs2 data. */
>>>> +                                             label = "EPCQ Flash 0 JFFS 2";
>>>> +                                             reg = <0x1000000 0x1000000>;
>>>> +                                     };
>>>> +                             };
>>>> +                     }; //end epcq@...00000000 (epcq_controller_0)
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/Kconfig b/drivers/mtd/devices/Kconfig
>>>> index c49d0b1..020b864 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -218,6 +218,18 @@ config MTD_ST_SPI_FSM
>>>>         SPI Fast Sequence Mode (FSM) Serial Flash Controller and support
>>>>         for a subset of connected Serial Flash devices.
>>>>
>>>> +config MTD_ALTERA_EPCQ
>>>> +     tristate "Support Altera EPCQ/EPCS Flash chips"
>>>> +     depends on OF
>>>> +     help
>>>> +       This enables access to Altera EPCQ/EPCS flash chips, used for data
>>>> +       storage. See the driver source for the current list,
>>>> +       or to add other chips.
>>>> +
>>>> +       If you want to compile this driver as a module ( = code which can be
>>>> +       inserted in and removed from the running kernel whenever you want),
>>>> +       say M here and read <file:Documentation/kbuild/modules.txt>.
>>>> +
>>>>  if MTD_DOCG3
>>>>  config BCH_CONST_M
>>>>       default 14
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/Makefile b/drivers/mtd/devices/Makefile
>>>> index f0b0e61..b429c4d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/devices/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/Makefile
>>>> @@ -16,6 +16,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_SPEAR_SMI) += spear_smi.o
>>>>  obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_SST25L)     += sst25l.o
>>>>  obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_BCM47XXSFLASH)      += bcm47xxsflash.o
>>>>  obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_ST_SPI_FSM)    += st_spi_fsm.o
>>>> -
>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_MTD_ALTERA_EPCQ)                += altera_epcq.o
>>>>
>>>>  CFLAGS_docg3.o                       += -I$(src)
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/altera_epcq.c b/drivers/mtd/devices/altera_epcq.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..09213d5
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/altera_epcq.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,804 @@
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2014 Altera Corporation. All rights reserved
>>>> + *
>>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>>>> + * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
>>>> + * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT
>>>> + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
>>>> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License for
>>>> + * more details.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with
>>>> + * this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/err.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/errno.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/ioport.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/jiffies.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/log2.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/mtd/partitions.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/param.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/pm.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/sched.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/slab.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/wait.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#include "altera_epcq.h"
>>>> +
>>>> +/* data structure to maintain flash ids from different vendors */
>>>> +struct flash_device {
>>>> +     char *name;
>>>> +     bool is_epcs;
>>>> +     u32 device_id;
>>>> +     uint32_t sectorsize_inbytes;
>>>> +     uint64_t size_inbytes;
>>>> +     u32 pagesize;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +#define FLASH_ID(_n, _is_epcs, _id, _ssize, _size, _psize)   \
>>>> +{                            \
>>>> +     .name = (_n),           \
>>>> +     .is_epcs = (_is_epcs),          \
>>>> +     .device_id = (_id),     \
>>>> +     .sectorsize_inbytes = (_ssize), \
>>>> +     .size_inbytes = (_size),        \
>>>> +     .pagesize = (_psize),   \
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct flash_device flash_devices[] = {
>>>> +     FLASH_ID("epcq16"    , 0, 0x15, 0x10000, 0x200000, 0x100),
>>>> +     FLASH_ID("epcq32"    , 0, 0x16, 0x10000, 0x400000, 0x100),
>>>> +     FLASH_ID("epcq64"    , 0, 0x17, 0x10000, 0x800000, 0x100),
>>>> +     FLASH_ID("epcq128"   , 0, 0x18, 0x10000, 0x1000000, 0x100),
>>>> +     FLASH_ID("epcq256"   , 0, 0x19, 0x10000, 0x2000000, 0x100),
>>>> +     FLASH_ID("epcq512"   , 0, 0x20, 0x10000, 0x4000000, 0x100),
>>>> +
>>>> +     FLASH_ID("epcs16"    , 1, 0x14, 0x10000, 0x200000, 0x100),
>>>> +     FLASH_ID("epcs64"    , 1, 0x16, 0x10000, 0x800000, 0x100),
>>>> +     FLASH_ID("epcs128"   , 1, 0x18, 0x40000, 0x1000000, 0x100),
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +static inline struct altera_epcq_flash *get_flash_data(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     return container_of(mtd, struct altera_epcq_flash, mtd);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static u32 altera_epcq_read_sr(struct altera_epcq *dev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     return readl(dev->csr_base + EPCQ_SR_REG);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int altera_epcq_wait_till_ready(struct altera_epcq *dev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     unsigned long finish;
>>>> +     int status;
>>>> +
>>>> +     finish = jiffies + EPCQ_MAX_TIME_OUT;
>>>> +     do {
>>>> +             status = altera_epcq_read_sr(dev);
>>>> +             if (status < 0)
>>>> +                     return status;
>>>> +             else if (!(status & EPCQ_SR_WIP))
>>>> +                     return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +             cond_resched();
>>>> +     } while (!time_after_eq(jiffies, finish));
>>>> +
>>>> +     dev_err(&dev->pdev->dev, "epcq controller is busy, timeout\n");
>>>> +     return -EBUSY;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int get_flash_index(u32 flash_id, bool is_epcs)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     int index;
>>>> +
>>>> +     for (index = 0; index < ARRAY_SIZE(flash_devices); index++) {
>>>> +             if (flash_devices[index].device_id == flash_id &&
>>>> +                 flash_devices[index].is_epcs == is_epcs)
>>>> +                     return index;
>>>> +     }
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* Memory chip is not listed and not supported */
>>>> +     return -ENODEV;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int altera_epcq_write_erase_check(struct altera_epcq *dev,
>>>> +                                      bool write_erase)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     u32 val;
>>>> +     u32 mask;
>>>> +
>>>> +     if (write_erase)
>>>> +             mask = EPCQ_ISR_ILLEGAL_WRITE_MASK;
>>>> +     else
>>>> +             mask = EPCQ_ISR_ILLEGAL_ERASE_MASK;
>>>> +
>>>> +     val = readl(dev->csr_base + EPCQ_ISR_REG);
>>>> +     if (val & mask) {
>>>> +             dev_err(&dev->pdev->dev,
>>>> +                     "write/erase failed, sector might be protected\n");
>>>> +             /*clear this status for next use*/
>>>> +             writel(val, dev->csr_base + EPCQ_ISR_REG);
>>>> +             return -EIO;
>>>> +     }
>>>> +     return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int altera_epcq_erase_chip(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     int ret;
>>>> +     u32 val;
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq *dev = mtd->priv;
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* Wait until finished previous write command. */
>>>> +     ret = altera_epcq_wait_till_ready(dev);
>>>
>>> This pattern is pretty silly. We don't need to have every operation
>>> check the status of the previous operation. Each operation should check
>>> itself. You obviously copied this one... but we recently changed that:
>>>
>>>     commit dfa9c0cba4ea20e766bbb4f89152b05d00ab9ab3
>>>     Author: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
>>>     Date:   Wed Aug 6 18:16:57 2014 -0700
>>>
>>>         mtd: spi-nor: move "wait-till-ready" checks into erase/write
>>>         functions
>>>
>>>
>>>     https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=dfa9c0cba4ea20e766bbb4f89152b05d00ab9ab3
>>>
Noted
>>>> +     if (ret)
>>>> +             return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* erase chip. */
>>>> +     val = EPCQ_MEM_OP_BULK_ERASE_CMD;
>>>> +     writel(val, dev->csr_base + EPCQ_MEM_OP_REG);
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* Wait until finished previous write command. */
>>>> +     ret = altera_epcq_wait_till_ready(dev);
>>>> +     if (ret)
>>>> +             return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +      /* check whether write triggered a illegal write interrupt */
>>>> +     ret = altera_epcq_write_erase_check(dev, 0);
>>>> +     if (ret < 0)
>>>> +             return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +     return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int altera_epcq_addr_to_sector(struct altera_epcq_flash *flash,
>>>> +                                   int addr_offset)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     int sector = 0;
>>>> +     int i;
>>>> +
>>>> +     for (i = 0; i < flash->num_sectors; i++) {
>>>> +             if (addr_offset >= i * flash->mtd.erasesize && addr_offset <
>>>> +                 (i * flash->mtd.erasesize + flash->mtd.erasesize)) {
>>>> +                     sector = i;
>>>> +                     return sector;
>>>> +             }
>>>> +     }
>>>
>>> Uh, really? Am I crazy, or shouldn't this whole function just be a
>>> really simple arithmetic operation? Like:
>>>
>>>         return addr_offset >> mtd->erasesize_shift;
>>>
My bad. This is so much easier this way.
>>>> +     return -1;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int altera_epcq_erase_sector(struct mtd_info *mtd,
>>>> +                                 int addr_offset)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq_flash *flash = get_flash_data(mtd);
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq *dev = mtd->priv;
>>>> +     u32 val;
>>>> +     int ret;
>>>> +     int sector_value;
>>>> +
>>>> +     ret = altera_epcq_wait_till_ready(dev);
>>>> +     if (ret)
>>>> +             return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +     sector_value = altera_epcq_addr_to_sector(flash, addr_offset);
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* sanity check that block_offset is a valid sector number */
>>>> +     if (sector_value < 0)
>>>> +             return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* sector value should occupy bits 17:8 */
>>>> +     val = (sector_value << 8) & EPCQ_MEM_OP_SECTOR_VALUE_MASK;
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* sector erase commands occupies lower 2 bits */
>>>> +     val |= EPCQ_MEM_OP_SECTOR_ERASE_CMD;
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* write sector erase command to EPCQ_MEM_OP register*/
>>>> +     writel(val, dev->csr_base + EPCQ_MEM_OP_REG);
>>>> +
>>>> +     ret = altera_epcq_wait_till_ready(dev);
>>>> +     if (ret)
>>>> +             return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +      /* check whether write triggered a illegal write interrupt */
>>>
>>> ^^ extra space here? You have <TAB><SPACE>/* check [...]
>>>
Noted :P
>>>> +     ret = altera_epcq_write_erase_check(dev, 0);
>>>> +     if (ret < 0)
>>>> +             return ret;
>>>> +
>>>> +     return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int altera_epcq_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *e_info)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     u32 addr;
>>>> +     int ret;
>>>> +     u32 len;
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq_flash *flash = get_flash_data(mtd);
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq *dev = mtd->priv;
>>>> +
>>>> +     addr = e_info->addr;
>>>> +     len = e_info->len;
>>>> +
>>>> +     if (flash->bank > dev->num_flashes - 1) {
>>>> +             dev_err(&dev->pdev->dev, "Invalid chip id\n");
>>>> +             return -EINVAL;
>>>> +     }
>>>> +     mutex_lock(&flash->lock);
>>>> +
>>>> +     /*erase whole chip*/
>>>> +     if (len == mtd->size) {
>>>> +             if (altera_epcq_erase_chip(mtd)) {
>>>> +                     e_info->state = MTD_ERASE_FAILED;
>>>> +                     mutex_unlock(&flash->lock);
>>>> +                     return -EIO;
>>>> +             }
>>>> +     /*"sector"-at-a-time erase*/
>>>> +     } else {
>>>> +             while (len) {
>>>> +                     ret = altera_epcq_erase_sector(mtd, addr);
>>>> +                     if (ret) {
>>>> +                             e_info->state = MTD_ERASE_FAILED;
>>>> +                             mutex_unlock(&flash->lock);
>>>> +                             return -EIO;
>>>> +                     }
>>>> +                     addr += mtd->erasesize;
>>>> +                     if (len < mtd->erasesize)
>>>> +                             len = 0;
>>>> +                     else
>>>> +                             len -= mtd->erasesize;
>>>> +             }
>>>> +     }
>>>> +     mutex_unlock(&flash->lock);
>>>> +     e_info->state = MTD_ERASE_DONE;
>>>> +     mtd_erase_callback(e_info);
>>>> +
>>>> +     return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int altera_epcq_read(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, size_t len,
>>>> +                         size_t *retlen, u8 *buf)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq_flash *flash = get_flash_data(mtd);
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq *dev = mtd->priv;
>>>> +     void *src;
>>>> +     int ret = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +     if (!flash || !dev)
>>>> +             return -ENODEV;
>>>
>>> Why would either of these be 0? If they are, you have much bigger
>>> problems, since you aren't checking these almost anywhere else. And the
>>> !flash check is pretty odd, since get_flash_data() is using
>>> container_of(), which is not likely to give you exactly 0...
>>>
Ok
>>>> +
>>>> +     if (flash->bank > dev->num_flashes - 1) {
>>>> +             dev_err(&dev->pdev->dev, "Invalid chip id\n");
>>>> +             return -EINVAL;
>>>> +     }
>>>> +
>>>> +     src = dev->data_base + from;
>>>> +
>>>> +     mutex_lock(&flash->lock);
>>>> +     /* wait till previous write/erase is done. */
>>>> +     ret = altera_epcq_wait_till_ready(dev);
>>>> +     if (ret)
>>>> +             goto err;
>>>> +
>>>> +     memcpy_fromio(buf, (u8 *)src, len);
>>>
>>> Drop the cast. Also, you get sparse warnings because you're dropping the
>>> __iomem. Why not just this?
>>>
>>>         memcpy_fromio(buf, dev->data_base + from, len);
>>>
>>> (BTW, you might consider running sparse on all your code. See
>>> Documentation/sparse.txt. It tells you how to get it, but you can often
>>> just download it through your distro's package manager.)
>>>
Noted
>>>> +     *retlen = len;
>>>> +
>>>> +err:
>>>> +     mutex_unlock(&flash->lock);
>>>> +     return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int altera_epcq_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, size_t len,
>>>> +                          size_t *retlen, const u8 *buf)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq_flash *flash = get_flash_data(mtd);
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq *dev = mtd->priv;
>>>> +     void *dest;
>>>> +     int ret = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +     if (!flash || !dev)
>>>> +             return -ENODEV;
>>>
>>> Also here. I don't think you need these checks.
>>>
Noted
>>>> +
>>>> +     if (flash->bank > dev->num_flashes - 1) {
>>>> +             dev_err(&dev->pdev->dev, "Invalid chip id\n");
>>>> +             return -EINVAL;
>>>> +     }
>>>> +     dest = dev->data_base + to;
>>>> +
>>>> +     mutex_lock(&flash->lock);
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* wait until finished previous write command. */
>>>> +     ret = altera_epcq_wait_till_ready(dev);
>>>> +     if (ret)
>>>> +             goto err;
>>>> +
>>>> +     memcpy_toio(dest, buf, len);
>>>
>>> Similar. Why not just this?
>>>
>>>         memcpy_toio(dev->data_base + to, buf, len);
>>>
Noted
>>>> +     *retlen += len;
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* wait until finished previous write command. */
>>>> +     ret = altera_epcq_wait_till_ready(dev);
>>>> +     if (ret)
>>>> +             goto err;
>>>> +
>>>> +      /* check whether write triggered a illegal write interrupt */
>>>> +     ret = altera_epcq_write_erase_check(dev, 1);
>>>> +     if (ret < 0)
>>>> +             goto err;
>>>> +
>>>> +err:
>>>> +     mutex_unlock(&flash->lock);
>>>> +     return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int altera_epcq_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq_flash *flash = get_flash_data(mtd);
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq *dev = mtd->priv;
>>>> +     uint32_t offset = ofs;
>>>> +     int ret = 0;
>>>> +     u32 sector_start, sector_end;
>>>> +     u32 num_sectors;
>>>> +     u32 mem_op;
>>>> +     unsigned sr_bp = 0;
>>>> +     unsigned sr_tb = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +     sector_start = altera_epcq_addr_to_sector(flash, offset);
>>>> +     sector_end = altera_epcq_addr_to_sector(flash, offset + len);
>>>> +     num_sectors = flash->num_sectors;
>>>> +     dev_dbg(&dev->pdev->dev,
>>>> +             "%s: num_setor is %u,sector start is %u,sector end is %u\n",
>>>> +             __func__, num_sectors, sector_start, sector_end);
>>>> +
>>>> +     mutex_lock(&flash->lock);
>>>> +     /* wait until finished previous write command. */
>>>> +     ret = altera_epcq_wait_till_ready(dev);
>>>> +     if (ret)
>>>> +             goto err;
>>>> +
>>>> +     if (sector_start >= num_sectors/2) {
>>>
>>> It's preferable to have spaces around operators. So 'num_sectors / 2'.
>>> The same thing comes up in several other places.
>>>
Noted
>>>> +             if (sector_start < num_sectors-(num_sectors / 4))
>>>> +                     sr_bp = __ilog2_u32(num_sectors);
>>>> +             else if (sector_start < num_sectors-(num_sectors / 8))
>>>> +                     sr_bp = __ilog2_u32(num_sectors) - 1;
>>>> +             else if (sector_start < num_sectors-(num_sectors / 16))
>>>> +                     sr_bp = __ilog2_u32(num_sectors) - 2;
>>>> +             else if (sector_start < num_sectors-(num_sectors / 32))
>>>> +                     sr_bp = __ilog2_u32(num_sectors) - 3;
>>>> +             else if (sector_start < num_sectors-(num_sectors / 64))
>>>> +                     sr_bp = __ilog2_u32(num_sectors) - 4;
>>>> +             else if (sector_start < num_sectors-(num_sectors / 128))
>>>> +                     sr_bp = __ilog2_u32(num_sectors) - 5;
>>>> +             else if (sector_start < num_sectors-(num_sectors / 256))
>>>> +                     sr_bp = __ilog2_u32(num_sectors) - 6;
>>>> +             else if (sector_start < num_sectors-(num_sectors / 512))
>>>> +                     sr_bp = __ilog2_u32(num_sectors) - 7;
>>>> +             else if (sector_start < num_sectors-(num_sectors / 1024))
>>>> +                     sr_bp = __ilog2_u32(num_sectors) - 8;
>>>> +             else
>>>> +                     sr_bp = 0;  /* non area protected */
>>>
>>> Yikes, that's ugly! And I'm not sure it matches the EPCQ doc I found.
>>> I'm pretty sure you can rewrite this if/else-if/else block in about 1
>>> line though.
>>>
Yes, i understand that it looks ugly. But it is the best i can do
since this function has to satisfy for all the supported devices
(http://www.altera.com.my/literature/hb/cfg/cfg_cf52012.pdf, start
from page 19)
>>>> +
>>>> +             if (sr_bp < 0) {
>>>
>>> sr_bp is unsigned, so this is never true.
>>>
Ok.  I will change to int type.
>>>> +                     dev_err(&dev->pdev->dev, "%s: address is out of range\n"
>>>> +                             , __func__);
>>>> +                     ret = -EINVAL;
>>>> +                     goto err;
>>>> +             }
>>>> +             /*set TB = 0*/
>>>> +             sr_tb = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +     } else {
>>>> +             if (sector_end < 1)
>>>> +                     sr_bp = 1;
>>>> +             else if (sector_end < 2)
>>>> +                     sr_bp = 2;
>>>> +             else if (sector_end < 4)
>>>> +                     sr_bp = 3;
>>>> +             else if (sector_end < 8)
>>>> +                     sr_bp = 4;
>>>> +             else if (sector_end < 16)
>>>> +                     sr_bp = 5;
>>>> +             else if (sector_end < 32)
>>>> +                     sr_bp = 6;
>>>> +             else if (sector_end < 64)
>>>> +                     sr_bp = 7;
>>>> +             else if (sector_end < 128)
>>>> +                     sr_bp = 8;
>>>> +             else if (sector_end < 256)
>>>> +                     sr_bp = 9;
>>>> +             else if (sector_end < 512)
>>>> +                     sr_bp = 10;
>>>> +             else
>>>> +                     sr_bp = 16; /*protect all areas*/
>>>
>>> Again, this is ugly. How about this?
>>>
>>>         sr_bp = fls(sector_end) + 1;
>>>
Oh. I did not know got this fls function. I will apply it.
>>>> +
>>>> +             sr_tb = 1;
>>>> +     }
>>>> +
>>>> +     mem_op = (sr_tb << 12) | (sr_bp << 8);
>>>> +     mem_op &= EPCQ_MEM_OP_SECTOR_PROTECT_VALUE_MASK;
>>>> +     mem_op |= EPCQ_MEM_OP_SECTOR_PROTECT_CMD;
>>>> +     writel(mem_op, dev->csr_base + EPCQ_MEM_OP_REG);
>>>> +
>>>> +err:
>>>> +     mutex_unlock(&flash->lock);
>>>> +     return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int altera_epcq_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq_flash *flash = get_flash_data(mtd);
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq *dev = mtd->priv;
>>>> +
>>>> +     int ret = 0;
>>>> +     u32 mem_op;
>>>> +
>>>> +     mutex_lock(&flash->lock);
>>>> +     /* wait until finished previous write command. */
>>>> +     ret = altera_epcq_wait_till_ready(dev);
>>>> +     if (ret)
>>>> +             goto err;
>>>> +     dev_info(&dev->pdev->dev, "Unlock all protected area\n");
>>>> +     mem_op = 0;
>>>> +     mem_op &= EPCQ_MEM_OP_SECTOR_PROTECT_VALUE_MASK;
>>>> +     mem_op |= EPCQ_MEM_OP_SECTOR_PROTECT_CMD;
>>>> +     writel(mem_op, dev->csr_base + EPCQ_MEM_OP_REG);
>>>> +
>>>> +err:
>>>> +     mutex_unlock(&flash->lock);
>>>> +     return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void altera_epcq_chip_select(struct altera_epcq *dev, u32 bank)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     u32 val = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +     switch (bank) {
>>>> +     case 0:
>>>> +             val = EPCQ_CHIP_SELECT_0;
>>>> +             break;
>>>> +     case 1:
>>>> +             val = EPCQ_CHIP_SELECT_1;
>>>> +             break;
>>>> +     case 2:
>>>> +             val = EPCQ_CHIP_SELECT_2;
>>>> +             break;
>>>> +     default:
>>>> +             return;
>>>> +     }
>>>> +
>>>> +     writel(val, dev->csr_base + EPCQ_CHIP_SELECT_REG);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int altera_epcq_probe_flash(struct altera_epcq *dev, u32 bank)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     int ret = 0;
>>>> +     u32 val = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +     mutex_lock(&dev->lock);
>>>> +
>>>> +     /*select bank*/
>>>
>>> Comment spacing, here and elsewhere:
>>>
Ok
>>>         /* select bank */
>>>
>>>> +     altera_epcq_chip_select(dev, bank);
>>>> +
>>>> +     ret = altera_epcq_wait_till_ready(dev);
>>>> +     if (ret)
>>>> +             goto err;
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* get device sillicon id */
>>>> +     if (dev->is_epcs)
>>>> +             val = readl(dev->csr_base + EPCQ_SID_REG);
>>>> +     else
>>>> +             val = readl(dev->csr_base + EPCQ_RDID_REG);
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* get flash index based on the device list*/
>>>> +     ret = get_flash_index(val, dev->is_epcs);
>>>> +     return 0;
>>>> +err:
>>>> +     mutex_unlock(&dev->lock);
>>>> +     return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int altera_epcq_probe_config_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>>> +                                    struct device_node *np,
>>>> +                                    struct altera_epcq_plat_data *pdata)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     struct device_node *pp = NULL;
>>>> +     struct resource *epcq_res;
>>>> +     int i = 0;
>>>> +     u32 id;
>>>> +
>>>> +     pdata->is_epcs = of_property_read_bool(np, "is-epcs");
>>>> +
>>>> +     epcq_res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
>>>> +                                             "csr_base");
>>>> +     if (!epcq_res) {
>>>
>>> devm_ioremap_resource() will check the that 'epcq_res' is valid, so you
>>> don't need this whole 'if' block.
>>>
Ok
>>>> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "resource csr base is not defined\n");
>>>> +             return -ENODEV;
>>>> +     }
>>>> +
>>>> +     pdata->csr_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, epcq_res);
>>>> +     if (IS_ERR(pdata->csr_base)) {
>>>> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: ERROR: failed to map csr base\n",
>>>> +                     __func__);
>>>> +             return PTR_ERR(pdata->csr_base);
>>>> +     }
>>>> +
>>>> +     epcq_res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
>>>> +                                             "data_base");
>>>> +     if (!epcq_res) {
>>>
>>> Same here.
Ok
>>>
>>>> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "resource data base is not defined\n");
>>>> +             return -ENODEV;
>>>> +     }
>>>> +
>>>> +     pdata->data_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, epcq_res);
>>>> +     if (IS_ERR(pdata->data_base)) {
>>>> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: ERROR: failed to map data base\n",
>>>> +                     __func__);
>>>> +             return PTR_ERR(pdata->data_base);
>>>> +     }
>>>> +
>>>> +     pdata->board_flash_info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
>>>> +                                            sizeof(*pdata->board_flash_info),
>>>> +                                            GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* Fill structs for each subnode (flash device) */
>>>> +     while ((pp = of_get_next_child(np, pp))) {
>>>
>>> for_each_available_child_of_node()?
>>>
>>>> +             struct altera_epcq_flash_info *flash_info;
>>>> +
>>>> +             flash_info = &pdata->board_flash_info[i];
>>>
>>> This is never used. Either use it below, or drop the local variable.
>>>
Ok
>>>> +             pdata->np[i] = pp;
>>>> +
>>>> +             /* Read bank id from DT */
>>>> +             if (of_get_property(pp, "reg", &id))
>>>
>>> Is this property optional? Your DT binding doc doesn't make it clear,
>>> but it seems like a property which would be wise to require (i.e., not
>>> optional).
>>>
>>>> +                     pdata->board_flash_info[i].bank = id;
>>>> +             i++;
>>>> +     }
>>>> +     pdata->num_flashes = i;
>>>> +     return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int altera_epcq_setup_banks(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>>> +                                u32 bank, struct device_node *np,
>>>> +                                struct altera_epcq_plat_data *pdata)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq *dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>>> +     struct mtd_part_parser_data ppdata = {};
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq_flash_info *flash_info;
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq_flash *flash;
>>>> +     struct mtd_partition *parts = NULL;
>>>
>>> Drop this variable. Just use NULL directly below.
>>>
>>>> +     int count = 0;
>>>
>>> Same. Just use 0 below.
>>>
Ok
>>>> +     int flash_index;
>>>> +     int ret = 0;
>>>> +     uint64_t size;
>>>> +     uint32_t sector_size;
>>>> +
>>>> +     flash_info = &pdata->board_flash_info[bank];
>>>> +     if (!flash_info)
>>>> +             return -ENODEV;
>>>> +
>>>> +     if (bank > pdata->num_flashes - 1)
>>>> +             return -EINVAL;
>>>> +
>>>> +     flash = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*flash), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> +     if (!flash)
>>>> +             return -ENOMEM;
>>>> +     flash->bank = bank;
>>>> +
>>>> +     mutex_init(&flash->lock);
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* verify whether flash is really present on board */
>>>> +     flash_index = altera_epcq_probe_flash(dev, bank);
>>>> +     if (flash_index < 0) {
>>>> +             dev_info(&dev->pdev->dev, "epcq:flash%d not found\n",
>>>> +                      flash->bank);
>>>> +             return flash_index;
>>>> +     }
>>>> +
>>>> +     dev->flash[bank] = flash;
>>>> +
>>>> +     size = flash_devices[flash_index].size_inbytes;
>>>> +     sector_size = flash_devices[flash_index].sectorsize_inbytes;
>>>> +     /*use do_div instead of plain div to avoid linker err*/
>>>> +     do_div(size, sector_size);
>>>> +     flash->num_sectors = size;
>>>> +
>>>> +     /*mtd framework */
>>>> +     flash->mtd.priv = dev;
>>>> +     flash->mtd.name = flash_devices[flash_index].name;
>>>> +     flash->mtd.type = MTD_NORFLASH;
>>>> +     flash->mtd.writesize = 1;
>>>> +     flash->mtd.flags = MTD_CAP_NORFLASH;
>>>> +     flash->mtd.size = flash_devices[flash_index].size_inbytes;
>>>> +     flash->mtd.erasesize = flash_devices[flash_index].sectorsize_inbytes;
>>>> +     flash->mtd._erase = altera_epcq_erase;
>>>> +     flash->mtd._read = altera_epcq_read;
>>>> +     flash->mtd._write = altera_epcq_write;
>>>> +     flash->mtd._lock = altera_epcq_lock;
>>>> +     flash->mtd._unlock = altera_epcq_unlock;
>>>> +
>>>> +     dev_info(&pdev->dev, "mtd .name=%s .size=0x%llx (%lluM)\n",
>>>> +              flash->mtd.name, (long long)flash->mtd.size,
>>>> +              (long long)(flash->mtd.size >> 20));
>>>> +
>>>> +     dev_info(&pdev->dev, ".erasesize = 0x%x(%uK)\n",
>>>> +              flash->mtd.erasesize, flash->mtd.erasesize >> 10);
>>>> +
>>>> +     ppdata.of_node = np;
>>>> +
>>>> +     ret = mtd_device_parse_register(&flash->mtd, NULL, &ppdata, parts,
>>>> +                                     count);
>>>> +     if (ret) {
>>>> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Err MTD partition=%d\n", ret);
>>>> +             goto err;
>>>
>>> You don't want to unregister a MTD that failed to register. The MTD core
>>> code should handle that itself.
>>>
>>> Instead of this if (ret) {} block, I'd just make this:
>>>
>>>         return mtd_device_parse_register(&flash->mtd, NULL, &ppdata, NULL, 0);
>>>
Ok
>>>> +     }
>>>> +
>>>> +     return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +err:
>>>> +     mtd_device_unregister(&flash->mtd);
>>>> +     return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int altera_epcq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq_plat_data *pdata = NULL;
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq *dev;
>>>> +     int ret = 0;
>>>> +     int i;
>>>> +
>>>> +     if (!np) {
>>>> +             ret = -ENODEV;
>>>> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no device found\n");
>>>> +             goto err;
>>>> +     }
>>>> +
>>>> +     pdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev,
>>>> +                          sizeof(struct altera_epcq_plat_data),
>>>> +                          GFP_KERNEL);
>>>> +
>>>> +     if (!pdata) {
>>>> +             ret = -ENOMEM;
>>>> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: ERROR: no memory\n", __func__);
>>>
>>> Unnecessary print. The MM code will print plenty of info if you're
>>> out of memory.
>>>
>>>> +             goto err;
>>>> +     }
>>>> +     ret = altera_epcq_probe_config_dt(pdev, np, pdata);
>>>> +     if (ret) {
>>>> +             ret = -ENODEV;
>>>> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "probe fail\n");
>>>> +             goto err;
>>>> +     }
>>>> +
>>>> +     dev = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*dev), GFP_ATOMIC);
>>>> +     if (!dev) {
>>>> +             ret = -ENOMEM;
>>>> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "mem alloc fail\n");
>>>
>>> Same here.
>>>
>>>> +             goto err;
>>>> +     }
>>>> +     mutex_init(&dev->lock);
>>>> +     dev->pdev = pdev;
>>>> +     dev->is_epcs = pdata->is_epcs;
>>>> +     dev->csr_base = pdata->csr_base;
>>>> +     dev->data_base = pdata->data_base;
>>>> +
>>>> +     /*check number of flashes*/
>>>> +     dev->num_flashes = pdata->num_flashes;
>>>> +     if (dev->num_flashes > MAX_NUM_FLASH_CHIP) {
>>>> +             dev_err(&pdev->dev, "exceeding max number of flashes\n");
>>>> +             dev->num_flashes = MAX_NUM_FLASH_CHIP;
>>>> +     }
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* check clock*/
>>>> +     dev->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>>>> +     if (IS_ERR(dev->clk)) {
>>>> +             ret = PTR_ERR(dev->clk);
>>>> +             goto err;
>>>> +     }
>>>> +     ret = clk_prepare_enable(dev->clk);
>>>> +     if (ret)
>>>> +             goto err;
>>>> +
>>>> +     platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dev);
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* loop for each serial flash which is connected to epcq */
>>>> +     for (i = 0; i < dev->num_flashes; i++) {
>>>> +             ret = altera_epcq_setup_banks(pdev, i, pdata->np[i], pdata);
>>>> +             if (ret) {
>>>> +                     dev_err(&pdev->dev, "bank setup failed\n");
>>>> +                     goto err_bank_setup;
>>>> +             }
>>>> +     }
>>>> +
>>>> +     return 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +err_bank_setup:
>>>> +     clk_disable_unprepare(dev->clk);
>>>> +err:
>>>> +     return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int altera_epcq_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq *dev;
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq_flash *flash;
>>>> +     int ret, i;
>>>> +
>>>> +     dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>>> +
>>>> +     /* clean up for all nor flash */
>>>> +     for (i = 0; i < dev->num_flashes; i++) {
>>>> +             flash = dev->flash[i];
>>>> +             if (!flash)
>>>> +                     continue;
>>>> +
>>>> +             /* clean up mtd stuff */
>>>> +             ret = mtd_device_unregister(&flash->mtd);
>>>> +             if (ret)
>>>> +                     dev_err(&pdev->dev, "error removing mtd\n");
>>>> +     }
>>>> +
>>>> +     clk_disable_unprepare(dev->clk);
>>>> +
>>>> +     return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>>>
>>> Make this CONFIG_PM_SLEEP.
>>>
>>>> +static int altera_epcq_suspend(struct device *dev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq *sdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>>> +
>>>> +     clk_disable_unprepare(sdev->clk);
>>>> +
>>>> +     return 0;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int altera_epcq_resume(struct device *dev)
>>>> +{
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq *sdev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>>>> +     int ret = -EPERM;
>>>
>>> Drop 'ret'.
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +     ret = clk_prepare_enable(sdev->clk);
>>>
>>> Just:
>>>
>>>         return clk_prepare_enable(sdev->clk);
>>>
>>>> +
>>>> +     return ret;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(altera_epcq_pm_ops, altera_epcq_suspend,
>>>> +                      altera_epcq_resume);
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +
>>>> +static const struct of_device_id altera_epcq_id_table[] = {
>>>> +     { .compatible = "altr,epcq-1.0" },
>>>> +     {}
>>>> +};
>>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, altera_epcq_id_table);
>>>> +
>>>> +static struct platform_driver altera_epcq_driver = {
>>>> +     .driver = {
>>>> +             .name = ALTERA_EPCQ_RESOURCE_NAME,
>>>> +             .bus = &platform_bus_type,
>>>> +             .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>>>
>>> The .owner assignment is no longer necessary.
>>>
>>>> +             .of_match_table = altera_epcq_id_table,
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
>>>
>>> Also CONFIG_PM_SLEEP.
>>>
>>>> +             .pm = &altera_epcq_pm_ops,
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +     },
>>>> +     .probe = altera_epcq_probe,
>>>> +     .remove = altera_epcq_remove,
>>>> +};
>>>> +module_platform_driver(altera_epcq_driver);
>>>> +
>>>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Viet Nga Dao <vndao@...era.com>");
>>>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MTD Altera EPCQ Driver");
>>>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/devices/altera_epcq.h b/drivers/mtd/devices/altera_epcq.h
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..c3d15e5
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/devices/altera_epcq.h
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2014 Altera Corporation. All rights reserved
>>>> + *
>>>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>>>> + * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
>>>> + * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT
>>>> + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
>>>> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License for
>>>> + * more details.
>>>> + *
>>>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with
>>>> + * this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +#ifndef __ALTERA_ECPQ_H
>>>> +#define __ALTERA_ECPQ_H
>>>> +
>>>> +#define ALTERA_EPCQ_RESOURCE_NAME        "altera_epcq"
>>>> +/* max possible slots for serial flash chip in the EPCQ controller */
>>>> +#define MAX_NUM_FLASH_CHIP   3
>>>> +
>>>> +/* macro to define partitions for flash devices */
>>>> +#define DEFINE_PARTS(n, of, s)               \
>>>
>>> This macro is not used anywhere. Drop it?
>>>
Ok
>>>> +{                                    \
>>>> +     .name = n,                      \
>>>> +     .offset = of,                   \
>>>> +     .size = s,                      \
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +struct altera_epcq_flash_info {
>>>> +     u32 bank;
>>>> +     struct mtd_partition *partitions;
>>>> +     int nr_partitions;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +struct altera_epcq_plat_data {
>>>> +     void __iomem *csr_base;
>>>> +     void __iomem *data_base;
>>>> +     bool is_epcs;
>>>> +     u32 num_flashes;
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq_flash_info *board_flash_info;
>>>> +     struct device_node *np[MAX_NUM_FLASH_CHIP];
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +struct altera_epcq {
>>>> +     struct clk *clk;
>>>> +     bool is_epcs;
>>>> +     struct mutex lock;      /*device lock*/
>>>> +     void __iomem *csr_base;
>>>> +     void __iomem *data_base;
>>>> +     struct platform_device *pdev;
>>>> +     u32 num_flashes;
>>>> +     struct altera_epcq_flash *flash[MAX_NUM_FLASH_CHIP];
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +struct altera_epcq_flash {
>>>> +     u32 bank;
>>>> +     u32 num_sectors;
>>>> +     u32 num_parts;
>>>> +     struct mtd_partition *parts;
>>>> +     struct mutex lock;      /*flash lock*/
>>>> +     struct mtd_info mtd;
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>>> +/* Define max times to check status register before we give up. */
>>>> +#define EPCQ_MAX_TIME_OUT                    (40 * HZ)
>>>> +
>>>> +/* defines for status register */
>>>> +#define EPCQ_SR_REG                          0x0
>>>> +#define EPCQ_SR_WIP_MASK                     0x00000001
>>>> +#define EPCQ_SR_WIP                          0x1
>>>> +#define EPCQ_SR_WEL                          0x2
>>>> +#define EPCQ_SR_BP0                          0x4
>>>> +#define EPCQ_SR_BP1                          0x8
>>>> +#define EPCQ_SR_BP2                          0x10
>>>> +#define EPCQ_SR_BP3                          0x40
>>>> +#define EPCQ_SR_TB                           0x20
>>>> +
>>>> +/* defines for device id register */
>>>> +#define EPCQ_SID_REG                         0x4
>>>> +#define EPCQ_RDID_REG                                0x8
>>>> +#define EPCQ_RDID_MASK                               0x000000FF
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * EPCQ_MEM_OP register offset
>>>> + *
>>>> + * The EPCQ_MEM_OP register is used to do memory protect and erase operations
>>>> + *
>>>> + */
>>>> +#define EPCQ_MEM_OP_REG                              0xC
>>>> +
>>>> +#define EPCQ_MEM_OP_CMD_MASK                 0x00000003
>>>> +#define EPCQ_MEM_OP_BULK_ERASE_CMD           0x00000001
>>>> +#define EPCQ_MEM_OP_SECTOR_ERASE_CMD         0x00000002
>>>> +#define EPCQ_MEM_OP_SECTOR_PROTECT_CMD               0x00000003
>>>> +#define EPCQ_MEM_OP_SECTOR_VALUE_MASK                0x0003FF00
>>>> +#define EPCQ_MEM_OP_SECTOR_PROTECT_VALUE_MASK        0x00001F00
>>>> +#define EPCQ_MEM_OP_SECTOR_PROTECT_SHIFT     8
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * EPCQ_ISR register offset
>>>> + *
>>>> + * The EPCQ_ISR register is used to determine whether an invalid write or erase
>>>> + * operation trigerred an interrupt
>>>> + *
>>>> + */
>>>> +#define EPCQ_ISR_REG                         0x10
>>>> +
>>>> +#define EPCQ_ISR_ILLEGAL_ERASE_MASK          0x00000001
>>>> +#define EPCQ_ISR_ILLEGAL_WRITE_MASK          0x00000002
>>>> +
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * EPCQ_IMR register offset
>>>> + *
>>>> + * The EPCQ_IMR register is used to mask the invalid erase or the invalid write
>>>> + * interrupts.
>>>> + *
>>>> + */
>>>> +#define EPCQ_IMR_REG                         0x14
>>>> +#define EPCQ_IMR_ILLEGAL_ERASE_MASK          0x00000001
>>>> +
>>>> +#define EPCQ_IMR_ILLEGAL_WRITE_MASK          0x00000002
>>>> +
>>>> +#define EPCQ_CHIP_SELECT_REG                 0x18
>>>> +#define EPCQ_CHIP_SELECT_MASK                        0x00000007
>>>> +#define EPCQ_CHIP_SELECT_0                   0x00000001
>>>> +#define EPCQ_CHIP_SELECT_1                   0x00000002
>>>> +#define EPCQ_CHIP_SELECT_2                   0x00000004
>>>> +
>>>> +#endif /* __ALTERA_ECPQ_H */
>>>

Nga
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ