[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54C761EE.6070507@citrix.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 10:01:18 +0000
From: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>, <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...not-panic.com>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Luis Rodriguez <Mcgrof@...e.com>, <x86@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 2/2] x86/xen: allow privcmd hypercalls
to be preempted on 64-bit
On 27/01/15 08:35, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 27.01.15 at 02:51, <mcgrof@...not-panic.com> wrote:
> Even if David told you this would be acceptable, I have to question
> an abstract model of fixing issues on only 64-bit kernels - this may
> be acceptable for distro purposes, but seems hardly the right
> approach for upstream. If 32-bit ones are to become deliberately
> broken, the XEN config option should become dependent on !X86_32.
There are still legitimate reasons to prefer 32bit PV guests over 64bit
ones. Previous versions of this patch had 32bit support as well. Why
did you drop it?
~Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists