[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1422353800.14015.35.camel@x220>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:16:40 +0100
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: "Joe. C" <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
Cc: Valentin Rothberg <valentinrothberg@...il.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@...iatek.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, dandan.he@...iatek.com,
alan.cheng@...iatek.com, toby.liu@...iatek.com,
maoguang.meng@...iatek.com, huang eddie <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...soft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/5] ARM: mediatek: Add config options for mediatek
SoCs.
Joe,
On Thu, 2015-01-22 at 13:54 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 2015-01-21 6:28 GMT+01:00 Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@...iatek.com>:
> > From: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
> >
> > The upcoming MTK pinctrl driver have a big pin table for each SoC
> > and we don't want to bloat the kernel binary if we don't need it.
> > Add config options so we can build for one SoC only.
> >
> > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@...iatek.com>
>
> Applied to v3.20-next/soc
This became commit ad8a221e1f49 ("ARM: mediatek: Add config options for
mediatek SoCs.") in today's linux-next (ie, next-20150127). I noticed
because a script I use to check linux-next spotted a problem with it.
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig
> > index f73f588..f7e463c 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-mediatek/Kconfig
> > @@ -1,6 +1,26 @@
> > -config ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > +menuconfig ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > bool "Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx SoC" if ARCH_MULTI_V7
> > select ARM_GIC
> > select MTK_TIMER
> > help
> > Support for Mediatek MT65xx & MT81xx SoCs
> > +
> > +if ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > +
> > +config MACH_MT6589
> > + bool "MediaTek MT6589 SoCs support"
> > + default ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > +
> > +config MACH_MT6592
> > + bool "MediaTek MT6592 SoCs support"
> > + default ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > +
> > +config MACH_MT8127
> > + bool "MediaTek MT8127 SoCs support"
> > + default ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > +
> > +config MACH_MT8135
> > + bool "MediaTek MT8135 SoCs support"
> > + default ARCH_MEDIATEK
> > +
> > +endif
None of these four new MACH_MT* Kconfig symbols are currently used in
linux-next. I assume that patches that actually use them (either as a
Kconfig symbol or as a CONFIG_* macro) are still pending. Is that
correct?
Thanks,
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists