linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] of: fix size when dma-range is not used

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <54C77616.80301@arm.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Jan 2015 11:27:18 +0000
From:	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To:	Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>
CC:	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"suravee.suthikulpanit@....com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
	"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] of: fix size when dma-range is not used

Hi Murali,

On 23/01/15 22:32, Murali Karicheri wrote:
> Fix the dma-range size when the DT attribute is missing. i.e  set size to
> dev->coherent_dma_mask + 1 instead of dev->coherent_dma_mask. To detect
> overflow when mask is set to max of u64, add a check, log error and return.
> Some platform use mask format for size in DTS. So add a work around to
> catch this and fix.
>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@....com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
> ---
>   drivers/of/device.c |   14 +++++++++++++-
>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/device.c b/drivers/of/device.c
> index 2de320d..0a5ff54 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/device.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/device.c
> @@ -105,12 +105,24 @@ void of_dma_configure(struct device *dev, struct device_node *np)
>   	ret = of_dma_get_range(np, &dma_addr, &paddr, &size);
>   	if (ret < 0) {
>   		dma_addr = offset = 0;
> -		size = dev->coherent_dma_mask;
> +		size = dev->coherent_dma_mask + 1;
>   	} else {
>   		offset = PFN_DOWN(paddr - dma_addr);
> +		/*
> +		 * Add a work around to treat the size as mask + 1 in case
> +		 * it is defined in DT as a mask.
> +		 */
> +		if (size & 1)
> +			size = size + 1;
>   		dev_dbg(dev, "dma_pfn_offset(%#08lx)\n", offset);
>   	}
>
> +	/* if size is 0, we have an overflow of u64 */
> +	if (!size) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "invalid size\n");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +

This seems potentially fragile to dodgy DTs given that we might also be 
using size to make a mask later. Would it make sense to double-up a 
sanity check as mask-format detection? Something like:

if is_power_of_2(size)
	// use size
else if is_power_of_2(size + 1)
	// use size + 1
else
	// cry


Robin.

>   	dev->dma_pfn_offset = offset;
>
>   	coherent = of_dma_is_coherent(np);
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/