[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54C7881F.6020501@ahsoftware.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:44:15 +0100
From: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Ball <chris@...ntf.net>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: print message if a card supports secure erase/trim
Am 27.01.2015 um 13:31 schrieb Richard Weinberger:
>> Also it's unlikely I will send any further patch. There are still 21 from me where I've exposed sysfs attributes for NAND devices which are still not applied and most NAND devices
>> still don't have a sysfs entry.
>>
>> So why should I waste my time again?
>
> If you give up after the first review round there is nothing I can do for you.
> Postings like https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/30/162 are also not really beneficial
> to get a patch merged.
Yes. Sorry, but I had so many bad experiences with maintainers. They
told me that using functions means hiding stuff, that I should bisect
even when I was absolutely sure which patch was wrong (and everxyone
could see it by just reading the source and by reading my comments, I've
got blamed because I prefer a controlled BUG_ON() (which might even just
kill the involved tasks, depending on config settings) instead of a
desastrous memory corruption which (hard-) reseted the machine (and
might have done even more bad things) and so on.
Regards,
Alexander Holler
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists