linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 028/126] sched/deadline: Fix migration of SCHED

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1422361031-19364-29-git-send-email-luis.henriques@canonical.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:15:33 +0000
From:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Dario Faggioli <raistlin@...ux.it>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16.y-ckt 028/126] sched/deadline: Fix migration of SCHED_DEADLINE tasks

3.16.7-ckt5 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>

commit 6a503c3be937d275113b702e0421e5b0720abe8a upstream.

According to global EDF, tasks should be migrated between runqueues
without checking if their scheduling deadlines and runtimes are valid.
However, SCHED_DEADLINE currently performs such a check:
a migration happens doing:

	deactivate_task(rq, next_task, 0);
	set_task_cpu(next_task, later_rq->cpu);
	activate_task(later_rq, next_task, 0);

which ends up calling dequeue_task_dl(), setting the new CPU, and then
calling enqueue_task_dl().

enqueue_task_dl() then calls enqueue_dl_entity(), which calls
update_dl_entity(), which can modify scheduling deadline and runtime,
breaking global EDF scheduling.

As a result, some of the properties of global EDF are not respected:
for example, a taskset {(30, 80), (40, 80), (120, 170)} scheduled on
two cores can have unbounded response times for the third task even
if 30/80+40/80+120/170 = 1.5809 < 2

This can be fixed by invoking update_dl_entity() only in case of
wakeup, or if this is a new SCHED_DEADLINE task.

Signed-off-by: Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <raistlin@...ux.it>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1418813432-20797-2-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.it
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
---
 kernel/sched/deadline.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index fc4f98b1258f..a07b08ce8307 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -823,10 +823,10 @@ enqueue_dl_entity(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se,
 	 * parameters of the task might need updating. Otherwise,
 	 * we want a replenishment of its runtime.
 	 */
-	if (!dl_se->dl_new && flags & ENQUEUE_REPLENISH)
-		replenish_dl_entity(dl_se, pi_se);
-	else
+	if (dl_se->dl_new || flags & ENQUEUE_WAKEUP)
 		update_dl_entity(dl_se, pi_se);
+	else if (flags & ENQUEUE_REPLENISH)
+		replenish_dl_entity(dl_se, pi_se);
 
 	__enqueue_dl_entity(dl_se);
 }
-- 
2.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/