linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: Add pinctrl bindings for mt65xx/mt81xx.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 27 Jan 2015 15:07:26 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc:	Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Hongzhou Yang <hongzhou.yang@...iatek.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Vladimir Murzin <vladimir.murzin@....com>,
	Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	huang eddie <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>, dandan.he@...iatek.com,
	alan.cheng@...iatek.com, toby.liu@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings: Add pinctrl bindings for mt65xx/mt81xx.

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 4:57 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 10:45:09AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:

>> As discussed with Sascha Hauer it is ambigous to use "pins" for
>> a numerical value indicating both a mux setting and a pin. Sascha
>> suggests using "pinmux" and adding this as a secondary generic
>> binding for this type of pin controllers that use numbers and #defines
>> to set up bindings.
>>
>> We should still move these parsing functions to the core.
>
> I tried that for the last few days and failed.
>
> Part of the problem is that the core lacks the data structures to put
> the information in. There is
>
> struct pinctrl_map_mux {
>         const char *group;
>         const char *function;
> };
>
> but its meaning is SoC specific. Some SoCs combine the pins found in a
> dt subnode to one group (i.MX, rockchip, at91) while others make an
> individual group from each single pin (Tegra, others?). Also the
> function string is SoC specific. Some SoCs just define functions like
> "alt1".."altn" which are valid for all groups, others define different
> function names for each group.
>
> Another thing is that the binding gives us numbers, but struct
> pinctrl_map_mux expects strings, so the numbers would have to be
> converted to strings. This is crude since the contents of struct
> pinctrl_map_mux are converted from strings back to numbers later from
> the pinctrl core with the help of the driver. So we would have to
> translate the numbers from the bindings to strings just to convert them
> back to numbers before passing them to the driver later.

So can we use a union?

struct pinctrl_map_mux {
        union group {
              const char *groupstr;
              u16 groupno;
        };
        union function {
              const char *functionstr;
              u16 funcno;
        };
};

The augment the code to reference foo->group.groupstr or
foo->group.groupno etc depending on runpath.

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/