[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150127173128.GA1555@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 09:31:28 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Laura Abbott <lauraa@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Jan 27 (build failures due to 'don't offset
memmap for flatmem')
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 07:51:23PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Changes since 20150123:
>
> The arm64 tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
>
> The net-next tree gained conflicts against the arm-soc and net trees.
>
> The drm-panel tree gained a conflict against the drm tree.
>
> The wireless-drivers-next tree gained a build failure for which I reverted
> a commit.
>
> The block tree gained conflicts against the vfs and Linus' trees.
>
> The clockevents tree gained a conflict against the arm tree.
>
> The akpm tree lost a patch that turned up elsewhere.
>
> Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 5237
> 4877 files changed, 200964 insertions(+), 94565 deletions(-)
>
There are various build failures due to commit
'mm/page_alloc.c: don't offset memmap for flatmem',
which assumes that ARCH_PFN_OFFSET is defined for all architectures,
but it isn't. This is also the first use of ARCH_PFN_OFFSET outside
an architecture directory.
Build fails for mn10300, m68k_nommu, and avr32.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists