linux-kernel - Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failures due to 'mm: account pmd page tables to the process'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20150127132433.dbe4461d9caeecdb50f28b42@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 27 Jan 2015 13:24:33 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	sfr@...b.auug.org.au, mhocko@...e.cz,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: mmotm 2015-01-22-15-04: qemu failures due to 'mm: account pmd
 page tables to the process'

On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 08:24:28 -0800 Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:

> > __PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED is defined during <asm/pgtable.h> which is not
> > included into <linux/mm_types.h>. And we cannot include it here since
> > many of <asm/pgtables> needs <linux/mm_types.h> to define struct page.
> > 
> > I failed to come up with better solution rather than put nr_pmds into
> > mm_struct unconditionally.
> > 
> > One possible solution would be to expose number of page table levels
> > architecture has via Kconfig, but that's ugly and requires changes to
> > all architectures.
> > 
> FWIW, I tried a number of approaches. Ultimately I gave up and concluded
> that it has to be either this patch or, as you say here, we would have
> to add something like PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED as a Kconfig option.

It's certainly a big mess.  Yes, I expect that moving
__PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED and probably PAGETABLE_LEVELS into Kconfig logic
would be a good fix.

Adding 8 bytes to the mm_struct (sometimes) isn't a huge issue, but
it does make the kernel just a little bit worse.

Has anyone taken a look at what the Kconfig approach would look like?

Possibly another fix for this would be to move mm_struct into its own
header file, or something along those lines?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/