[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150127221909.GA21671@roeck-us.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:19:09 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Zubair Lutfullah Kakakhel <Zubair.Kakakhel@...tec.com>,
wim@...ana.be, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
paul@...pouillou.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt: watchdog: Add DT binding documentation for
jz47xx watchdog timer
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:29:49PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 January 2015 12:52:29 Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > Driver does this (today):
> >
> > drvdata->rtc_clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "rtc");
> >
> > Isn't that the name to use ? Just wondering.
>
> Just because the driver uses it at the moment does not mean it's the name
> that the IP block uses.
>
> clk_get() has the unpleasant property of doing fuzzy matching
> on the name that is passed. It first tries to use the string
> as the name of the clock input of the device, but if that is
> not there, it falls back to looking for a global clk with a con_id.
>
> In DT, we only support the first kind, but if a driver currently
> uses the second, you get the wrong name.
>
> Looking at arch/mips/jz4740/clock.c now, this seems to be exactly
> what is going on here: there is no clkdev_add call to associate
> the device clocks, so it can only match a global clock entry. :(
>
Me confused :-(.
Does that mean the driver needs to be fixed, that the DT property
needs to change (to what ?), or both ?
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists