[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54C88ACF.9000401@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 08:07:59 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Wincy Van <fanwenyi0529@...il.com>
CC: "gleb@...nel.org" <gleb@...nel.org>,
"Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@...el.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: nVMX: Enable nested posted interrupt processing.
On 28/01/2015 06:54, Wincy Van wrote:
> Why? L1 may config these features seperately, we should check them one by one.
> e.g. L1 may enable posted interrupt processing and virtual interrupt
> delivery, but leaving virtualize x2apic mode disabled, then
> nested_cpu_has_virt_x2apic_mode will return false.
You're right, I confused && with ||.
*blush*.
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists