[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150128141417.ba2e413fd8ccc8bfd65196e1@freescale.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:14:17 -0600
From: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@...escale.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>,
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <k.khlebnikov@...sung.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"Linux Memory Management List" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<josh@...htriplett.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] powerpc/mm: fix undefined reference to
`.__kernel_map_pages' on FSL PPC64
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:22:02 +1100
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-01-27 at 18:57 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 10:33:59 +0900 Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > > 2015-01-28 10:01 GMT+09:00 Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>:
> > > > On Mon, 2015-01-26 at 13:22 -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
> > > >> arch/powerpc has __kernel_map_pages implementations in mm/pgtable_32.c, and
> > > >
> > > > I'd be happy to take this through the powerpc tree for 3.20, but for this:
> > > >
> > > >> depends on:
> > > >> From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
> > > >> Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2015 10:28:58 +0900
> > > >> Subject: [PATCH] mm/debug_pagealloc: fix build failure on ppc and some other archs
> > > >
> > > > I don't have that patch in my tree.
> > > >
> > > > But in what way does this patch depend on that one?
> > > >
> > > > It looks to me like it'd be safe to take this on its own, or am I wrong?
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > These two patches are merged to Andrew's tree now.
> >
> > That didn't answer either of Michael's questions ;)
> >
> > Yes, I think they're independent. I was holding off on the powerpc
sorry - my bad, they are indeed completely independent.
> > one, waiting to see if it popped up in linux-next via your tree. I can
> > merge both if you like?
>
> Right, I didn't think I'd seen it in your tree :)
>
> I'm happy to take this one, saves a possible merge conflict.
I'm fine either way (I work on linux-next).
Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists