[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150128012747.919048398@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2015 17:27:43 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3.14 65/77] mm/memory.c: use entry = ACCESS_ONCE(*pte) in handle_pte_fault()
3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
commit c0d73261f5c1355a35b8b40e871d31578ce0c044 upstream.
Use ACCESS_ONCE() in handle_pte_fault() when getting the entry or
orig_pte upon which all subsequent decisions and pte_same() tests will
be made.
I have no evidence that its lack is responsible for the mm/filemap.c:202
BUG_ON(page_mapped(page)) in __delete_from_page_cache() found by
trinity, and I am not optimistic that it will fix it. But I have found
no other explanation, and ACCESS_ONCE() here will surely not hurt.
If gcc does re-access the pte before passing it down, then that would be
disastrous for correct page fault handling, and certainly could explain
the page_mapped() BUGs seen (concurrent fault causing page to be mapped
in a second time on top of itself: mapcount 2 for a single pte).
Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
mm/memory.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -3646,7 +3646,7 @@ static int handle_pte_fault(struct mm_st
pte_t entry;
spinlock_t *ptl;
- entry = *pte;
+ entry = ACCESS_ONCE(*pte);
if (!pte_present(entry)) {
if (pte_none(entry)) {
if (vma->vm_ops) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists