linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.4 055/177] virtio_pci: fix virtio spec compliance on restore

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1422418236-12852-110-git-send-email-lizf@kernel.org>
Date:	Wed, 28 Jan 2015 12:07:57 +0800
From:	lizf@...nel.org
To:	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.4 055/177] virtio_pci: fix virtio spec compliance on restore

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>

3.4.106-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


commit 6fbc198cf623944ab60a1db6d306a4d55cdd820d upstream.

On restore, virtio pci does the following:
+ set features
+ init vqs etc - device can be used at this point!
+ set ACKNOWLEDGE,DRIVER and DRIVER_OK status bits

This is in violation of the virtio spec, which
requires the following order:
- ACKNOWLEDGE
- DRIVER
- init vqs
- DRIVER_OK

This behaviour will break with hypervisors that assume spec compliant
behaviour.  It seems like a good idea to have this patch applied to
stable branches to reduce the support butden for the hypervisors.

Cc: Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
---
 drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
index 2e03d41..a41f264 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci.c
@@ -745,6 +745,7 @@ static int virtio_pci_restore(struct device *dev)
 	struct pci_dev *pci_dev = to_pci_dev(dev);
 	struct virtio_pci_device *vp_dev = pci_get_drvdata(pci_dev);
 	struct virtio_driver *drv;
+	unsigned status = 0;
 	int ret;
 
 	drv = container_of(vp_dev->vdev.dev.driver,
@@ -755,14 +756,40 @@ static int virtio_pci_restore(struct device *dev)
 		return ret;
 
 	pci_set_master(pci_dev);
+	/* We always start by resetting the device, in case a previous
+	 * driver messed it up. */
+	vp_reset(&vp_dev->vdev);
+
+	/* Acknowledge that we've seen the device. */
+	status |= VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_ACKNOWLEDGE;
+	vp_set_status(&vp_dev->vdev, status);
+
+	/* Maybe driver failed before freeze.
+	 * Restore the failed status, for debugging. */
+	status |= vp_dev->saved_status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED;
+	vp_set_status(&vp_dev->vdev, status);
+
+	if (!drv)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* We have a driver! */
+	status |= VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER;
+	vp_set_status(&vp_dev->vdev, status);
+
 	vp_finalize_features(&vp_dev->vdev);
 
-	if (drv && drv->restore)
+	if (drv->restore) {
 		ret = drv->restore(&vp_dev->vdev);
+		if (ret) {
+			status |= VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED;
+			vp_set_status(&vp_dev->vdev, status);
+			return ret;
+		}
+	}
 
 	/* Finally, tell the device we're all set */
-	if (!ret)
-		vp_set_status(&vp_dev->vdev, vp_dev->saved_status);
+	status |= VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK;
+	vp_set_status(&vp_dev->vdev, status);
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/