lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:19:42 +0800
From:	Wincy Van <fanwenyi0529@...il.com>
To:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:	"gleb@...nel.org" <gleb@...nel.org>,
	"Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@...el.com>,
	"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...ux.intel.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: nVMX: Enable nested virtualize x2apic mode.

On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 24/01/2015 11:21, Wincy Van wrote:
>> +       memset(vmx_msr_bitmap_nested, 0xff, PAGE_SIZE);
>
> Most bytes are always 0xff.  It's better to initialize it to 0xff once,
> and set the bit here if !nested_cpu_has_virt_x2apic_mode(vmcs12).

Indeed, will do.

>
>> +       if (nested_cpu_has_virt_x2apic_mode(vmcs12))
>
> Please add braces here, because of the /* */ command below.

Will do.

>
>> +               /* TPR is allowed */
>> +               nested_vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap,
>> +                               vmx_msr_bitmap_nested,
>> +                               APIC_BASE_MSR + (APIC_TASKPRI >> 4),
>> +                               MSR_TYPE_R | MSR_TYPE_W);
>>
>> +static inline int nested_vmx_check_virt_x2apic(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> +                                              struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
>> +{
>> +       if (nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12, SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES))
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>
> No need for this function and nested_cpu_has_virt_x2apic_mode.  Just
> inline them in their caller(s).  Same for other cases throughout the series.
>

Do you mean that we should also inline the same functions in the other
patches of this patch set?
I think these functions will keep the code tidy, just like the
functions as nested_cpu_has_preemption_timer, nested_cpu_has_ept, etc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ