[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150128065754.4466f07b@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 06:57:54 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Cc: Dominik Vogt <vogt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <maasami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>,
Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 2/3] ftrace: introduce nohotpatch function attribute
On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 06:36:45 +0100
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 09:42:28AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 07:19:42 +0100
> > Dominik Vogt <vogt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > > While the kernel may use only profiling or hotpatch at the same
> > > time, Gcc is able to generate both for the same function.
> >
> > Understood, but would that be useful for the kernel?
>
> Right now not. We may change that anyway in the future if needed.
>
> Steven, how do we proceed with this small series?
>
> Since there don't seem to be any objections, I'll repost with the
> changed notrace define. However I think the whole stuff should go
> upstream via the ftrace tree. Is that ok with you?
I can take it or you can, I'm fine either way. If you want to take it,
just add my Acked-by. If you prefer me to take it, just let me know.
-- Steve
>
> FWIW, the s390 gcc hotpatch feature was merged in the meantime:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=11762b8363737591bfb9c66093bc2edf289b917f
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists