linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86: Add support for the clwb instruction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:58:52 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	H Peter Anvin <h.peter.anvin@...el.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86: Add support for the clwb instruction

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 09:53:51AM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> Add support for the new clwb (cache line write back) instruction.  This
> instruction was announced in the document "Intel Architecture
> Instruction Set Extensions Programming Reference" with reference number
> 319433-022.

...

> After this function completes the data pointed to by vaddr is has been
> accepted to memory and will be durable if the vaddr points to
> persistent memory.
> 
> Regarding the details of how the alternatives assembly is set up, we
> need one additional byte at the beginning of the clflush so that we can
> flip it into a clflushopt by changing that byte into a 0x66 prefix.  Two
> options are to either insert a 1 byte ASM_NOP1, or to add a 1 byte
> NOP_DS_PREFIX.  Both have no functional effect with the plain clflush,
> but I've been told that executing a clflush + prefix should be faster
> than executing a clflush + NOP.
> 
> We had to hard code the assembly for clwb because, lacking the ability
> to assemble the clwb instruction itself, the next closest thing is to
> have an xsaveopt instruction with a 0x66 prefix.  Unfortunately xsaveopt
> itself is also relatively new, and isn't included by all the GCC
> versions that the kernel needs to support.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: H Peter Anvin <h.peter.anvin@...el.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>

Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/