[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20150128230847.16cc8e4fbb5f601dc667d94d@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 23:08:47 +0400
From: Sergei Rogachev <rogachevsergei@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: iamjoonsoo.kim@....com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] mm/page_ext: remove unnecessary stack_trace field
On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 14:43:19 -0800
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 00:52:12 +0300 Sergei Rogachev <rogachevsergei@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > Page owner uses the page_ext structure to keep meta-information
> > for every page in the system. The structure also contains a field
> > of type 'struct stack_trace', page owner uses this field during
> > invocation of the function save_stack_trace. It is easy to notice
> > that keeping a copy of this structure for every page in the system
> > is very inefficiently in terms of memory.
> >
> > The patch removes this unnecessary field of page_ext and forces
> > page owner to use a stack_trace structure allocated on the stack.
> >
>
> Fair enough.
>
> What do you think of the below tweaks? Seems a bit neater, and it will
> cause all unmentioned fields to be zeroed out. It's not a bug to leave
> .max_entries uninitialised in print_page_owner(), but it's nice not to
> leave loose ends.
Yes, with your fix the code looks much better!
>
> --- a/mm/page_owner.c~mm-page_ext-remove-unnecessary-stack_trace-field-fix
> +++ a/mm/page_owner.c
> @@ -59,15 +59,14 @@ void __reset_page_owner(struct page *pag
>
> void __set_page_owner(struct page *page, unsigned int order, gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> - struct page_ext *page_ext;
> - struct stack_trace trace;
> + struct page_ext *page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
> + struct stack_trace trace = {
> + .nr_entries = 0,
> + .max_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(page_ext->trace_entries),
> + .entries = &page_ext->trace_entries[0],
> + .skip = 3,
> + };
>
> - page_ext = lookup_page_ext(page);
> -
> - trace.nr_entries = 0;
> - trace.max_entries = ARRAY_SIZE(page_ext->trace_entries);
> - trace.entries = &page_ext->trace_entries[0];
> - trace.skip = 3;
> save_stack_trace(&trace);
>
> page_ext->order = order;
> @@ -83,8 +82,11 @@ print_page_owner(char __user *buf, size_
> {
> int ret;
> int pageblock_mt, page_mt;
> - struct stack_trace trace;
> char *kbuf;
> + struct stack_trace trace = {
> + .nr_entries = page_ext->nr_entries,
> + .entries = &page_ext->trace_entries[0],
> + };
>
> kbuf = kmalloc(count, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!kbuf)
> @@ -122,9 +124,6 @@ print_page_owner(char __user *buf, size_
> if (ret >= count)
> goto err;
>
> - trace.nr_entries = page_ext->nr_entries;
> - trace.entries = &page_ext->trace_entries[0];
> -
> ret += snprint_stack_trace(kbuf + ret, count - ret, &trace, 0);
> if (ret >= count)
> goto err;
> _
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists