[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150128141742.GB11705@kwain>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 15:17:42 +0100
From: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
Cc: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com>,
"sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com" <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
"ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com"
<ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
"dwmw2@...radead.org" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
"computersforpeace@...il.com" <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
"thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com"
<thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>, Jimmy Xu <zmxu@...vell.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] mtd: pxa3xx_nand: add a non mandatory ECC clock
Hi Jisheng!
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 11:35:52AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Jan 2015 06:10:09 -0800
> Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
> > index d00ac392d1c4..2681ec4abafa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
> > @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ struct pxa3xx_nand_info {
> > struct nand_hw_control controller;
> > struct platform_device *pdev;
> >
> > - struct clk *clk;
> > + struct clk *clk, *ecc_clk;
> > void __iomem *mmio_base;
> > unsigned long mmio_phys;
> > struct completion cmd_complete, dev_ready;
> > @@ -1608,7 +1608,7 @@ static int alloc_nand_resource(struct platform_device
> > *pdev)
> > spin_lock_init(&chip->controller->lock);
> > init_waitqueue_head(&chip->controller->wq);
> > - info->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> > + info->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "nfc");
> > if (IS_ERR(info->clk)) {
>
> Do we need to fall back to unnamed clock here? Otherwise I guess it will break
> other platforms.
Yes, as Andrew pointed out we need to keep the NULL here to avoid
breaking other platforms.
> >
> > /* initialize all interrupts to be disabled */
> > @@ -1687,6 +1694,9 @@ static int alloc_nand_resource(struct platform_device
> > *pdev) fail_free_buf:
> > free_irq(irq, info);
> > kfree(info->data_buff);
> > +fail_disable_ecc_clk:
> > + if (!IS_ERR(info->ecc_clk))
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(info->ecc_clk);
>
> we can remove the IS_ERR check to simplify this error path since commit
> 63589e92c2d9("clk: Ignore error and NULL pointers passed to clk_{unprepare, disable}()")
>
> > fail_disable_clk:
> > clk_disable_unprepare(info->clk);
> > return ret;
> > @@ -1709,6 +1719,8 @@ static int pxa3xx_nand_remove(struct platform_device
> > *pdev) pxa3xx_nand_free_buff(info);
> >
> > clk_disable_unprepare(info->clk);
> > + if (!IS_ERR(info->ecc_clk))
> > + clk_disable_unprepare(info->ecc_clk);
>
> we can remove the IS_ERR check too.
Yes! Thanks for the hint, I'll remove these useless checks in v2.
Thanks!
Antoine
--
Antoine Ténart, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists