linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 28 Jan 2015 18:11:02 +0100
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the block tree with the vfs tree

On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 04:54:22AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> I don't mind opening a never-rebased branch for generic iov_iter-related stuff;
> if you prefer to handle it that way - just tell.  The first two patches
> from that series would definitely go there; as for the rest... no preferences
> here.

It might make sense to just keep the VFS patches in your tree.
The target ones also are something I'd prefer if it goes through Nic
with additional review.  In addition they aren't really critical,
so if you merge the prep patches now we can feed the rest through
the proper trees in the .21 merge window.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/