| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <tip-566b5cfb035fb496280be61f976b5281563bfa27@git.kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2015 07:08:25 -0800
From: tip-bot for Namhyung Kim <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: acme@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl,
jolsa@...hat.com, kan.liang@...el.com, mingo@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, namhyung@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf diff: Fix -o/--order option behavior
Commit-ID: 566b5cfb035fb496280be61f976b5281563bfa27
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/566b5cfb035fb496280be61f976b5281563bfa27
Author: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
AuthorDate: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 09:45:48 +0900
Committer: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
CommitDate: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 13:24:35 -0300
perf diff: Fix -o/--order option behavior
The prior change fixes default output ordering with each column but it
breaks -o/--order option. This patch prepends a new hpp fmt struct to
sort list but not to output field list so that it can affect ordering
without adding a new output column.
The new hpp fmt uses its own compare functions which treats dummy
entries (which have no baseline) little differently - the delta field
can be computed without baseline but others (ratio and wdiff) are not.
The new output will look like below:
$ perf diff -o 2 perf.data.{old,cur,new}
...
# Baseline/0 Delta/1 Delta/2 Shared Object Symbol
# .......... ....... ....... ................. ..........................................
22.98% +0.51% +0.52% libc-2.20.so [.] _int_malloc
5.70% +0.28% +0.30% libc-2.20.so [.] free
4.38% -0.21% +0.25% a.out [.] main
1.32% -0.15% +0.05% a.out [.] free@plt
+0.01% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] intel_pstate_timer_func
+0.01% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave
+0.01% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] timekeeping_update.constprop.8
+0.01% +0.01% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] apic_timer_interrupt
0.01% -0.00% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] native_read_msr_safe
0.01% -0.01% -0.01% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] native_write_msr_safe
1.31% +0.03% -0.06% a.out [.] malloc@plt
31.50% -0.74% -0.23% libc-2.20.so [.] _int_free
32.75% +0.28% -0.83% libc-2.20.so [.] malloc
0.01% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] scheduler_tick
+0.01% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] read_tsc
+0.01% [kernel.kallsyms] [k] perf_adjust_freq_unthr_context.part.82
In above example, the output was sorted by 'Delta/2' column first, and
then 'Baseline/0' and finally 'Delta/1'.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1420677949-6719-8-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
---
tools/perf/builtin-diff.c | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 99 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
index 9844456..74aada5 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-diff.c
@@ -558,6 +558,37 @@ hist_entry__cmp_compute(struct hist_entry *left, struct hist_entry *right,
}
static int64_t
+hist_entry__cmp_compute_idx(struct hist_entry *left, struct hist_entry *right,
+ int c, int sort_idx)
+{
+ struct hist_entry *p_right, *p_left;
+
+ p_left = get_pair_data(left, &data__files[sort_idx]);
+ p_right = get_pair_data(right, &data__files[sort_idx]);
+
+ if (!p_left && !p_right)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (!p_left || !p_right)
+ return p_left ? -1 : 1;
+
+ if (c != COMPUTE_DELTA) {
+ /*
+ * The delta can be computed without the baseline, but
+ * others are not. Put those entries which have no
+ * values below.
+ */
+ if (left->dummy && right->dummy)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (left->dummy || right->dummy)
+ return left->dummy ? 1 : -1;
+ }
+
+ return __hist_entry__cmp_compute(p_left, p_right, c);
+}
+
+static int64_t
hist_entry__cmp_nop(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt __maybe_unused,
struct hist_entry *left __maybe_unused,
struct hist_entry *right __maybe_unused)
@@ -601,6 +632,30 @@ hist_entry__cmp_wdiff(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt,
return hist_entry__cmp_compute(right, left, COMPUTE_WEIGHTED_DIFF, d->idx);
}
+static int64_t
+hist_entry__cmp_delta_idx(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt __maybe_unused,
+ struct hist_entry *left, struct hist_entry *right)
+{
+ return hist_entry__cmp_compute_idx(right, left, COMPUTE_DELTA,
+ sort_compute);
+}
+
+static int64_t
+hist_entry__cmp_ratio_idx(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt __maybe_unused,
+ struct hist_entry *left, struct hist_entry *right)
+{
+ return hist_entry__cmp_compute_idx(right, left, COMPUTE_RATIO,
+ sort_compute);
+}
+
+static int64_t
+hist_entry__cmp_wdiff_idx(struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt __maybe_unused,
+ struct hist_entry *left, struct hist_entry *right)
+{
+ return hist_entry__cmp_compute_idx(right, left, COMPUTE_WEIGHTED_DIFF,
+ sort_compute);
+}
+
static void hists__process(struct hists *hists)
{
if (show_baseline_only)
@@ -1074,9 +1129,10 @@ static void data__hpp_register(struct data__file *d, int idx)
perf_hpp__register_sort_field(fmt);
}
-static void ui_init(void)
+static int ui_init(void)
{
struct data__file *d;
+ struct perf_hpp_fmt *fmt;
int i;
data__for_each_file(i, d) {
@@ -1106,6 +1162,46 @@ static void ui_init(void)
data__hpp_register(d, i ? PERF_HPP_DIFF__PERIOD :
PERF_HPP_DIFF__PERIOD_BASELINE);
}
+
+ if (!sort_compute)
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Prepend an fmt to sort on columns at 'sort_compute' first.
+ * This fmt is added only to the sort list but not to the
+ * output fields list.
+ *
+ * Note that this column (data) can be compared twice - one
+ * for this 'sort_compute' fmt and another for the normal
+ * diff_hpp_fmt. But it shouldn't a problem as most entries
+ * will be sorted out by first try or baseline and comparing
+ * is not a costly operation.
+ */
+ fmt = zalloc(sizeof(*fmt));
+ if (fmt == NULL) {
+ pr_err("Memory allocation failed\n");
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ fmt->cmp = hist_entry__cmp_nop;
+ fmt->collapse = hist_entry__cmp_nop;
+
+ switch (compute) {
+ case COMPUTE_DELTA:
+ fmt->sort = hist_entry__cmp_delta_idx;
+ break;
+ case COMPUTE_RATIO:
+ fmt->sort = hist_entry__cmp_ratio_idx;
+ break;
+ case COMPUTE_WEIGHTED_DIFF:
+ fmt->sort = hist_entry__cmp_wdiff_idx;
+ break;
+ default:
+ BUG_ON(1);
+ }
+
+ list_add(&fmt->sort_list, &perf_hpp__sort_list);
+ return 0;
}
static int data_init(int argc, const char **argv)
@@ -1171,7 +1267,8 @@ int cmd_diff(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix __maybe_unused)
if (data_init(argc, argv) < 0)
return -1;
- ui_init();
+ if (ui_init() < 0)
+ return -1;
sort__mode = SORT_MODE__DIFF;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists